340.02.5
RSDAJ
CH-VD
Art. 52 RÈGLEMENT sur le statut des personnes détenues placées en établissement de détention avant jugement (RSDAJ) - Assurance accident
Chapitre II, Section IX
Art. 52 RSDAJ · Assurance accident
1. Le Service pénitentiaire veille à ce que les personnes détenues avant jugement soient assurées pour des accidents pouvant survenir durant la détention.
2. A titre subsidiaire, les personnes détenues avant jugement sont couvertes contre les accidents par la police d'assurance conclue par le service.
3. L'étendue de la couverture est fixée par la convention signée entre le Service pénitentiaire et l'assureur accident.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (7)
D.cision.2021.10 · vd (Art. 52 RSDAJ)
Appellant v. Prosecutor (Visitation Denial)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the status of detained persons, which underlies the decision on contact restrictions.
D.cision.2014.1102 · vd (Art. 52 al. 1 RSDAJ)
Detainee Visitation and Phone Privileges Restriction Upheld
Cited in the reasoning section as the cantonal rule specifying the right to one visit per week for pre-trial detainees.
Arr.t.2014.847 · vd (Art. 52 al. 9 RSDAJ)
Father's Appeal of Supervised Visitation Order Granted Due to Denial of Right to Be Heard
Cited in the reasoning regarding the difficulty of exercising visitation rights while detained, although the substantive review was ultimately based on the procedural violation.
D.cision.2014.662 · vd (Art. 52 RSDAJ)
Prosecutor's Refusal of Visits and Calls Confirmed Due to Risk of Collusion
This article concerning the regulation of visits for pre-trial detainees in Vaud was cited as the cantonal basis for restricting contact.
D.cision.2014.643 · vd (Art. 52 RSDAJ)
Detained Parent Visits Authorized Despite Witness Concerns
Cited in the preamble, and its provisions concerning the right of detainees to receive visits were analyzed as the basis for the final decision.
D.cision.2014.607 · vd (Art. 52 RSDAJ)
Appellant v. Public Prosecutor (Denial of Contact with Co-Suspect)
Cited in the legal reasoning concerning cantonal regulations on visits for pre-trial detainees.
D.cision.2012.323 · vd (Art. 52 al. 2 RSDAJ)
Detainee Visitation Restrictions and Legitimate Expectations
Cited in the reasoning leading to the partial admission of the appeal, as the decision below failed to account for the possibility of case-by-case exceptions under this article.