340.01 LEP

CH-VD

Art. 38 LOI sur l'exécution des condamnations pénales (LEP) - Des décisions susceptibles de recours [ 2, 5, 7, 8 ]

Titre IV, Chapitre III

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (67 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 38 LEP · Des décisions susceptibles de recours [ 2, 5, 7, 8 ]

1. Peuvent faire l'objet d'un recours au Tribunal cantonal

- les décisions rendues par l'Office d'exécution des peines ;

- les décisions rendues sur recours par le Service pénitentiaire ;

- les décisions rendues par le juge d'application des peines et par le collège des juges d'application des peines qui ne peuvent pas faire l'objet d'un appel;

- ...

2. La procédure est régie par les dispositions du CPP [E] relatives au recours.

3. ...

4. Lorsque le recours porte sur la réintégration d'une personne condamnée en régime ordinaire d'exécution de peine ou de mesure, les décisions sur effet suspensif sont prises à trois juges.

← Art. 35 LEP sur l'exécution des condamnations pénales (LEP) - Objet Art. 38a LEP →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (399)

719----------- · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)

Appeal Against Refusal to Postpone Prison Sentence Execution Denied

Cited as the basis for the Cantonal Court's competence to review the decision of the Office of Sentence Execution regarding the postponement request.

529----------- · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)

Convict's Appeal on Suspended Family Leave Due to Undisclosed Pornography Use

This provision establishes the court's jurisdiction to rule on the appeal against the decision of the Prison Execution Office.

490----------- · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)

Prosecutor v. Convict on Addiction Treatment Efficacy

This provision governed the admissibility of the appeal filed against the decision of the judge responsible for the execution of sentences.

366----------- · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)

Denial of Appeal for Electronic Monitoring Due to Procedural Defect

Cited in the heading as context for the appeal jurisdiction, but not explicitly used in the final orders.

D.cision.2023.29 · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)

Appeal Regarding Prolongation of Therapeutic Measure Contingent on Deportation

Cited in the heading and in reasoning 1.1 as the basis for the appeal jurisdiction of the Cantonal Review Chamber.

D.cision.2023.28 · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)

Appeal Dismissed: Termination of Institutional Addiction Treatment Upheld Due to Non-Compliance

Cited regarding the admissibility of the appeal against the decision of the execution judge.

D.cision.2023.26 · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)

Prison Disciplinary Warning Upheld for Inmate Altercation

Cited in the reasoning section to establish jurisdiction for the appeal against the Penitentiary Service decision.

D.cision.2023.29 · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)

Detainee Appeal Regarding Unauthorized Possessions and Disciplinary Warning Upheld

Cited in the preamble to the decision, indicating the legal basis for the appeal to the Cantonal Tribunal against the decision of the Penitentiary Service.

149----------- · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)

Appeal Regarding Conditional Release Denial and Extension of Therapeutic Institutional Measure

This provision dictates the admissibility of the appeal to the Cantonal Tribunal (Chambre des recours pénale).

D.cision.2023.18 · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)

Prisoner's Appeal of Disciplinary Confinement Sanction and Denial of Legal Aid

This article establishes the basis for appealing a decision by the Penitentiary Service to the Cantonal Court.

D.cision.2023.55 · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)

Appeal Regarding Execution of Prison Sentence Due to Medical Condition Denied

Cited as the basis for the jurisdiction of the Cantonal Tribunal to review decisions from the execution office.

D.cision.2023.41 · vd (Art. 38 LEP)

Appellant v. Penal Execution Office (Electronic Monitoring Denial)

Cited in the reasoning section regarding the jurisdiction of the Execution Office to rule on electronic monitoring.

37----------- · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)

Appeal Regarding Postponement of Prison Sentence and Semi-Detention Request Due to Expulsion Order

Cited as the basis defining the authority of the Cantonal High Court to rule on appeals against decisions made by the Prison Execution Office.

984----------- · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)

Appeal Regarding Recusal Denial, Prison Transfer, and Solitary Confinement Justified by Reoffending Risk

Cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of the appeal against decisions of the Execution of Sentences Office, although the primary use is procedural context rather than a final operative order.

969----------- · vd (Art. 38 LEP)

Inmate Refusal to Return Pen Upheld as Disciplinary Offense

Cited as the basis for the admissibility of the appeal to the Cantonal Court against the decision of the Penitentiary Service.