312.11
VVGLContr
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 25 LOI sur les contraventions (LContr) - Montant de l'amende
Titre III, Chapitre I
Art. 25 LContr · Montant de l'amende
1. Les contraventions réprimées par l'autorité municipale sont passibles d'une amende de 500 francs au plus, contre chaque contrevenant, sous réserve des cas où la loi prévoit un montant inférieur.
2. L'amende peut être portée à 1000 francs en cas de récidive ou de contravention continue. Il y a récidive lorsque le contrevenant a déjà été condamné pour une contravention du même genre dans l'année qui précède la nouvelle contravention.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (37)
162----------- · vd (art. 25 al. 1 LContr)
Appeal of Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld on Credibility Grounds
Cited in the final orders as a basis for confirming the conviction for disturbing public order, tranquility, safety, and rest.
Jug.2023.147 · vd (art. 25 al. 1 LContr ad. 26 RGP)
Climate Activist Obstruction and Traffic Violations Appeal
This provision relates to the violation of the Cantonal Ordinance on Petty Offenses, which was confirmed in the final conviction (though the article citing RGP 41 was rejected, RGP 26 was confirmed).
444----------- · vd (art. 25 al. 1 LContr)
State v. Appellant (Traffic Violations and Custodial Sentence Appeal)
Cited in the dispositive to uphold the finding of guilt for the contravention of the cantonal law on contraventions.
Jug.2023.8 · vd (art. 25 al. 1 LContr e.r. art. 26 et 41 RGP)
Appellants v. State (Obstruction of Services)
F. was acquitted of the contravention charge in the revised judgment (Order IV, modified judgment III.IV).
Jug.2023.8 · vd (art. 25 al. 1 LContr e.r. art. 26 et 41 RGP)
Appellants v. State (Obstruction of Services)
J. was acquitted of the contravention charge in the revised judgment (Order VII, modified judgment III.VII).
Jug.2023.8 · vd (art. 25 al. 1 LContr e.r. art. 26 et 41 RGP)
Appellants v. State (Obstruction of Services)
K. was acquitted of the contravention charge in the revised judgment (Order I, modified judgment III.I).
Jug.2022.261 · vd (art. 25 al. 1 LContr en relation avec 41 RGP)
Appellants v. State: Climate Protest Obstruction Conviction Upheld
Cited as an offense for which X1 and X2 were convicted (contravention to the Vaud law on misdemeanors).
300----------- · vd (art. 25 al. 1 LContr)
Appeal Dismissed for Bridge Blockade and Resistance to Arrest
Used to confirm the conviction for violation of the cantonal contravention law.
281----------- · vd (art. 25 al. 1 LContr)
Unauthorized Demonstration Convictions Upheld Despite Joinder Request
This provision regarding contravention fines based on municipal regulations was confirmed in the judgment.
Jug.2022.397 · vd (art. 25 al. 1 LContr en relation avec 26 et 41 RGP)
Blockade Participants Convicted for Obstructing Public Services
Cited in the application clause for H.___ as a basis for her conviction for contraventions to the LContr.
Jug.2022.397 · vd (art. 25 al. 1 LContr en relation avec 26 et 41 RGP)
Blockade Participants Convicted for Obstructing Public Services
Cited in the application clause for Z.___ as a basis for his conviction for contraventions to the LContr.
Jug.2022.397 · vd (art. 25 al. 1 LContr en relation avec 26 et 41 RGP)
Blockade Participants Convicted for Obstructing Public Services
Cited in the application clauses for L.___ and R.___ as a basis for their conviction for contraventions to the LContr.
216----------- · vd (art. 25 al. 1 LContr en relation avec 26 RGP)
Climate Activists' Appeal of Convictions for Traffic Obstruction and Public Service Interference
Applied in the decision regarding N., W., R., Z., S., and U. concerning contravention of cantonal law.
Jug.2022.311 · vd (art. 25 al. 1 LContr en relation avec 41 RGP)
Obstruction of Public Services and Resistance to Police During Unauthorized Bridge Protest Upheld
The court confirmed the conviction for contravention to the cantonal law on misdemeanors (Loi vaudoise sur les contraventions) in connection with Art. 41 RGP.
Jug.2022.349 · vd (art. 25 al. 1 LContr)
Unauthorized Protest Obstruction Conviction Affirmed
The article is cited in the operative part (dispositive) as the basis for confirming the conviction for contravention of the cantonal law on contraventions.