312.01 LVCPP

CH-VD

Art. 19 LOI d'introduction du Code de procédure pénale suisse (LVCPP) - Droits et devoirs de communication (art. 75, al. 4 CPP) [ 6 ]

Chapitre VII

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (45 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 19 LVCPP · Droits et devoirs de communication (art. 75, al. 4 CPP) [ 6 ]

1. Les autorités pénales ne peuvent communiquer à d'autres autorités fédérales ou cantonales, à l'exclusion des autorités de poursuite pénale, des informations sur les procédures pénales qu'elles conduisent que si l'intérêt public à ce que ces informations soient communiquées l'emporte sur l'intérêt des parties à voir leurs droits de la personnalité respectés.

2. Le Ministère public avise le président du Conseil de la magistrature et le président du Tribunal cantonal, respectivement le Procureur général, de toute enquête pénale dirigée contre un magistrat ou un collaborateur de l'ordre judiciaire, respectivement du Ministère public.

3. Les parties sont informées de la communication, sauf si un intérêt public prépondérant exige que celle-ci demeure secrète.

← Art. 18 LVCPP d'introduction du Code de procédure pénale suisse (LVCPP) Art. 20 LVCPP →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (20)

631----------- · vd (Art. 19 al. 1 LVCPP)

Prosecutor's Order to Disclose Ongoing Domestic Violence Investigation to Correctional Officer's Disciplinary Authority Upheld

This provision, along with Art. 75 al. 4 CPP, established the basis for the lower authority's decision which the current appeal sought to overturn.

265----------- · vd (Art. 19 al. 1 LVCPP)

Physician Disciplinary Disclosure Appeal

Cited in the reasoning section (2.1.3) to establish the canton's legal basis for communication, which supports the confirmation of the order to communicate.

914----------- · vd (art. 19 al. 1 LVCPP)

Prosecutor General v. Police Assistant regarding Disclosure of Investigation for Secret Video Surveillance

The court found that the appeal was admissible because the appellant was entitled to request the review of the communication decision based on this provision.

724----------- · vd (Art. 19 al. 1 LVCPP)

Prosecutor's Duty to Inform Professional Authority During Criminal Investigation

Cited by the first instance judge and confirmed by the court as the sufficient legal basis for communicating information to administrative authorities.

D.cision.2022.59 · vd (Art. 19 al. 1 LVCPP)

Assistant Socio-Educative v. Prosecutor General (Obstruction of Justice and Professional Conduct)

Cited in the preliminary section as a legal basis relevant to the decision on communication to administrative authorities, supporting the discussion on the ground for the final order.

D.cision.2022.23 · vd (Art. 19 al. 1 LVCPP)

Educator's Privacy Trumps Disciplinary Notification After Serious Charges Dropped

This provision was cited in the heading and formed the legal basis relevant to the merits of the decision regarding communication to other authorities, although the final order did not explicitly cite it for the annulment itself.

1190----------- · vd (Art. 19 al. 1 LVCPP)

Prosecutor Disclosure to Disciplinary Authority in Healthcare Worker Sexual Assault Investigation

This provision established the balancing test (public interest vs. private interest) used by the lower authority whose decision was confirmed.

D.cision.2021.82 · vd (Art. 19 al. 1 LVCPP)

Prosecutor General v. DSAS: Communication of Criminal Investigation Against Healthcare Worker

Cited in the reasoning as the specific cantonal basis allowing the communication that was challenged in the appeal.

D.cision.2021.65 · vd (art. 19 al. 1 LVCPP)

Educator's Privacy vs. Public Interest in Disclosure of Criminal Investigation

This provision served as the cantonal legal basis used to justify the balancing of public interest against the right to privacy, which the court upheld.

D.cision.2021.57 · vd (Art. 19 al. 1 LVCPP)

Surgical Assistant's Privacy vs. Public Interest in Disclosure of Off-Duty Fraud Indictment

This provision is cited in the preamble and establishes the cantonal balancing test (public interest vs. private interest regarding personality rights) that the court applied to rule on the communication.

D.cision.2020.718 · vd (Art. 19 al. 1 LVCPP)

Criminal Investigation Disclosure Appeal by Child Pornography Defendant

This provision was central to the applicant's challenge regarding the communication of the proceedings; the court confirmed it allowed the communication, despite the applicant's interpretation.

D.cision.2019.806 · vd (Art. 19 al. 2 LVCPP)

Prosecutor's Obligation to Notify Judicial Authority of Criminal Investigation of Former Judicial Personnel Upheld

The court confirmed the order to notify the criminal investigation because the appellant was an employee of the Judicial Order when the investigation was opened.

D.cision.2018.436 · vd (art. 19 al. 1 LVCPP)

Prosecutor's Communication of Unreported ATM Find Overturned on Proportionality Grounds

The court overturned the lower decision based on the balancing of interests mandated by this article, finding insufficient public interest to communicate the penal order.

D.cision.2018.100 · vd (Art. 19 al. 1 LVCPP)

Prosecutor General v. Police Officer Regarding Disclosure of Criminal Investigation to Disciplinary Authority

This provision was applied as the main ground for confirming the decision, based on the finding that the public interest in communication outweighed the private interest.

D.cision.2017.475 · vd (Art. 19 al. 1 LVCPP)

DUI Conviction Disclosure vs. Employee Privacy

Cited in the introduction and reasoning as the Vaud cantonal law implementing the power granted by Art. 75 al. 4 CPP, which authorized the communication at issue.