312.01
LVCPP
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 14 LOI d'introduction du Code de procédure pénale suisse (LVCPP) - b) Cours d'appel pénale
Chapitre V
Art. 14 LVCPP · b) Cours d'appel pénale
1. La Cour d'appel pénale du Tribunal cantonal statue sur les appels formés contre les jugements pénaux rendus par les tribunaux de première instance.
2. La Cour d'appel pénale du Tribunal cantonal statue sur les demandes de révision.
3. Un membre de la Cour d'appel pénale statue comme juge unique sur les appels concernant des contraventions.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (43)
Jug.2022.345 · vd (Art. 14 al. 3 LVCPP)
Appeal Against Conviction for Qualified Battery of Son Upheld
Justifies the competence of a single judge to rule on the appeal concerning only a contravention.
Jug.2021.449 · vd (art. 14 al. 3 LVCPP)
Prosecutor v. Defendant on Home Cinema Volume Regulation
Cited in the reasoning section to justify the competence of a single judge for the appeal, although this specific reference does not appear in the final numbered orders (I-IV).
Jug.2020.472 · vd (art 14 al. 3 LVCPP)
Road Traffic Violation Appeal Fee Correction
This provision was cited in the reasoning to justify applying the reduced page rate for costs due to the judgment being rendered by a single judge.
D.cision.2020.10 · vd (art. 14 al. 3 LVCPP)
Public Prosecutor v. Acquittal for Mobile Phone Use While Driving
Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the case falls under the jurisdiction of a single judge for a contravention appeal.
Jug.2020.296 · vd (Art. 14 al. 3 LVCPP)
Appellant's Challenge to Procedural Costs Following Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld
Cited as a basis for the pronouncement, concerning the competence of a single judge for the appeal.
Jug.2020.159 · vd (art. 14 al. 3 LVCPP)
Appellant v. Municipality (Public Order Violation after Traffic Incident)
Cited in the reasoning establishing the competence of a single judge because the appeal concerned a contravention.
Jug.2020.155 · vd (art. 14 al. 3 LVCPP)
Traffic Violation Appeal and Sentence Confirmation
Cited in the reasoning section (1.1) regarding the competence of a single judge, but not in the dispositive orders (I-VI).
Jug.2019.325 · vd (art. 14 al. 3 LVCPP)
Federal Tribunal Voids Conviction for Negligent Employment Due to Procedural Errors, Upholds Administrative Fine
Cited in the preamble to the operative part as conferring competence to the single judge.
Jug.2019.243 · vd (art. 14 al. 3 LVCPP)
Dog Owner Acquitted on Grounds of Procedural Flaw and Causation by Son
Used in the final pronouncement as part of the basis for the decision (competence of a single judge).
Jug.2019.124 · vd (art. 14 al. 3 LVCPP)
Public Prosecutor v. Acquitted Individuals (Disturbing Order and Serving Alcohol to Intoxicated Person)
Cited as the procedural basis for the competence of a single judge to rule on the matter.
Jug.2018.140 · vd (Art. 14 al. 3 LVCPP)
Appellant v. State: Denial of Legal Fee Reimbursement for Traffic Contravention Acquittal
Cited in the operative part of the decision regarding the competence of a single judge for this type of appeal.
Jug.2018.7 · vd (art. 14 al. 3 LVCPP)
Necessity Defense in Traffic Violation Appeal
This cantonal procedural rule specifies the competence of a single judge for this type of appeal, as cited in the final pronouncement.
Jug.2017.229 · vd (art. 14 al. 3 LVCPP)
Traffic Violation Appeal Regarding Sun Glare and Inattention
Cited in the reasoning section (Point 1.2) to establish the competence of a single judge for this type of appeal.
Jug.2016.46 · vd (art. 14 al. 3 LVCPP)
Appellant Fails to File Timely Reasoned Appeal After Unclaimed Service Notice
Cited in the preamble to the operative part, as it establishes the competence of a single judge for appeals concerning contraventions.
D.cision.2016.32 · vd (art. 14 al. 3 LVCPP)
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Submission of Reasoned Declaration
This procedural provision was cited because the decision was made by a single judge in simplified written proceedings for a contravention appeal.