Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
211.41 GRCHCRFCFR CH-VD

Art. 62 CODE rural et foncier (CRF) - Procédure [ 7 ]

Titre II, Chapitre IV
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (167 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 62 CRF · Procédure [ 7 ]

1. Saisi d'une requête en enlèvement ou en écimage fondée sur les articles 50 et 57 à 59, le juge de paix, sitôt après l'échec de la tentative de conciliation, transmet d'office la requête à la municipalité accompagnée le cas échéant des conclusions reconventionnelles du défendeur.

2. La municipalité ou sa délégation détermine s'il y a lieu de protéger la plantation ou, lorsqu'elle l'est déjà, s'il convient d'autoriser l'abattage ou la taille, conformément aux articles 60 et 61 ainsi qu'aux dispositions de la législation sur la protection de la nature, des monuments et des sites [J] .

3. Une fois la décision municipale passée en force, le juge de paix statue le cas échéant sur l'application des articles 50 et 57 à 59, conformément aux dispositions du code de droit privé judiciaire vaudois, ainsi que du Code de procédure civile suisse [K] .

4. La même procédure est applicable au département cantonal compétent lorsque le classement ou la protection relève des autorités cantonales.

← Art. 61 CRF rural et foncier (CRF) - Champ d'application Art. 62a CRF →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (21)

AC.2017.0107 · vd (Art. 62 al. 2 CRF)
Neighbor Tree Dispute: Municipality Overstepping Civil Jurisdiction
The court's decision to annul the municipal decision and remit the case is based on the municipality exceeding its competence as defined by this provision regarding the scope of its determination.
AC.2015.0281 · vd (Art. 62 al. 1 CRF)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Parasol Pine Protection Status
The court's reasoning for annulling the decision relies on the procedural rule regarding when the Justice of the Peace must transmit the request to the municipality, showing the municipality was seized improperly according to this article.
AC.2015.0281 · vd (Art. 62 al. 2 CRF)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Parasol Pine Protection Status
The annulment of the decision is based on the municipality's premature action, which relates to the procedure outlined for municipal decisions following the failure of conciliation under this article.
AC.2014.0218 · vd (Art. 62 al. 2 CRF)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Spruce Tree Felling Authorization
The court noted that the municipality should have simply ascertained the inapplicability of LPNMS protection, as required by this procedural article for decisions concerning tree protection.
AC.2014.0145 · vd (art. 62 al. 2 CRF)
Owner v. Municipality Regarding Hedge Reduction and Spruce Tree Trimming
Although cited in the reasoning for the second ground for annulment (failure to rule on the tree), it was not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive orders I, II, III, or IV. Therefore, it must be excluded based on the strict rule for inclusion.
AC.2009.0012 · vd (Art. 62 al. 1 CRF)
Owner v. Municipality Regarding Tree Protection Status
Cited in the reasoning concerning the procedure where the court notes the failure of conciliation and the subsequent transmission to the municipality, which is relevant context for the procedural violation found.
AC.2009.0012 · vd (Art. 62 al. 3 CRF)
Owner v. Municipality Regarding Tree Protection Status
Cited in the reasoning regarding the subsequent steps the Judge of Peace must take after the municipal decision is final, which is part of the procedural context.
AC.2008.0270 · vd (art. 62 al. 2 CRF)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Tree Removal and Pruning
The procedure followed by the Peace Judge, referring the matter to the municipality regarding protection status and authorization, is based on this article.
AC.2007.0080 · vd (Art. 62 al. 2 CRF)
Property Owner v. Municipality (Hedge and Tree Removal)
The court noted that the municipality must refer to the conditions for authorization of cutting/pruning under this article, which are the same for both.
AC.2007.0080 · vd (Art. 62 al. 3 CRF)
Property Owner v. Municipality (Hedge and Tree Removal)
Mentioned in the context of the final decision resting with the Justice of the Peace regarding the request for removal or trimming.
AC.2007.0080 · vd (art. 62 al. 2 CRF)
Property Owner v. Municipality (Hedge and Tree Removal)
Mentioned in the context of clarifying that pruning and cutting are subject to the same conditions.
AC.2006.0038 · vd (art. 62 al. 2 CRF)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Hedge Maintenance Jurisdiction
The procedure followed by the municipality, which the court confirmed was correctly applied regarding the classification part of the decision.
AC.2005.0192 · vd (art. 61, art. 62 al. 2 CRF)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Linden Tree Pruning
Cited as rules determining the municipal review process regarding protection, felling, or pruning requests.
AC.2005.0192 · vd (art. 62 al. 2 CRF)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Linden Tree Pruning
This article governs the procedure where the municipality determines the need for protection, pruning, or felling of trees upon request.
AC.2005.0093 · vd (art. 62 al. 2 CRF)
Applicant v. Municipality (Tree Removal Denial)
Cited in the reasoning to support the requirement for the municipal authority to rule on authorization for cutting or trimming if the plantation is already protected.