Art. 61 CODE rural et foncier (CRF) - b) Exception

Titre II, Chapitre IV

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (167 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 61 CRF · b) Exception

1. Les articles 50 et 57 à 59 trouvent néanmoins application lorsque

1. la plantation prive un local d'habitation préexistant de son ensoleillement normal dans une mesure excessive;

2. la plantation nuit notablement à l'exploitation rationnelle d'un bien-fonds ou d'un domaine agricoles;

3. le voisin subit un préjudice grave du fait de la plantation; n'est pas considéré comme tel le ramassage nécessaire des fruits, fleurs, feuilles et brindilles.

2. Dans la mesure du possible, la taille et l'écimage seront ordonnés en lieu et place de l'enlèvement de la plante.

← Art. 60 CRF rural et foncier (CRF) - Champ d'application Art. 62 CRF →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (11)

AC.2012.0100 · vd (art. 61 ch. 3 in fine CRF)

Property Owners v. Municipality (Larch Tree Removal)

Cited in the reasoning section regarding nuisance from fallen needles/cones, but not used in the final orders.

AC.2005.0156 · vd (art. 61 al. 1 ch. 3 CRF)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Tree Topping

Cited when ruling that the damage caused by the tree does not constitute a serious prejudice under the relevant provision.

AC.2005.0192 · vd (art. 61, art. 62 al. 2 CRF)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Linden Tree Pruning

Cited as rules determining the municipal review process regarding protection, felling, or pruning requests.

AC.2005.0093 · vd (art. 61 al. 1 ch. 1 CRF)

Applicant v. Municipality (Tree Removal Denial)

Cited in the reasoning regarding the substantive criteria (loss of normal sunlight) that the municipality failed to address in its decision.

AC.2005.0093 · vd (art. 61 al. 1 ch. 3 CRF)

Applicant v. Municipality (Tree Removal Denial)

Cited in the reasoning regarding the substantive criteria (serious prejudice) that the municipality failed to address in its decision.

AC.2004.0265 · vd (Art. 61 al. 1 ch. 3 CRF)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Protected Thuja Tree Removal

Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the collection of leaves does not constitute serious prejudice, which underpins the rejection of the appeal.

AC.2000.0125 · vd (art. 61 al. 2 CRF)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Hedge Classification and Debris Removal

Used to confirm the municipality's limited competence regarding hedge trimming when the hedge is not under communal protection.

AC.1998.0128 · vd (art. 61 al. 1 ch. 3 CRF)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Tree Removal Denial

This provision was mentioned in the reasoning section as an alternative basis leading to the same result as the main grounds, although the final decision ultimately relied on the LPNMS framework.

AC.1993.0145 · vd (Art. 61 ch. 1 CRF)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Protected Ginkgo Tree

This provision, concerning the lack of prior existence of the dwelling relative to the plantation, was used to exclude its application.

AC.1993.0145 · vd (Art. 61 ch. 3 CRF)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Protected Ginkgo Tree

This provision, excluding minor damages (like leaf collection) from justifying tree removal, was used to dismiss the appellants' claims.

AC.1992.0242 · vd (art. 61 ch. 1 et 3 CRF)

Neighboring Property Tree Protection Appeal and Referral to Municipality

Cited in the reasoning as potential grounds for granting abatement authorization.

Art. 61 CODE rural et foncier (CRF) - b) Exception

Art. 61 CRF · b) Exception

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (11)