177.11
LPAV
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 61 LOI sur la profession d'avocat (LPAv) - Extinction de l'action disciplinaire
Chapitre VI
Art. 61 LPAv · Extinction de l'action disciplinaire
1. L'action disciplinaire s'éteint
- par la prescription (art. 19 LLCA [A] ) ;
- avec le décès de l'avocat ou de l'avocat stagiaire mis en cause.
2. L'article 19 LLCA est applicable à la prescription de l'action disciplinaire à l'encontre des avocats stagiaires et des maîtres de stage.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (18)
17.2015 · vd (art. 61 al. 1er LPAv)
Attorney Conflict of Interest in Successive Representation
This article was cited as the legal basis for ordering the costs of the case against the lawyer.
D.cision.2015.85 · vd (art. 61 al. 1er LPAv)
Attorney Conflict of Interest and Disciplinary Warning for Successive Representation
Applied to determine that the costs of the proceedings are charged to the lawyer F.______.
13.2015 · vd (art. 61 al. 2 LPAv par analogie)
Divorce Counsel Conflict of Interest Mooted by Withdrawal and Lack of True Attorney-Client Relationship
Cited as the basis for placing the costs of the decision on the applicant because the request was unfounded.
15.2015 · vd (art. 61 al. 1er LPAv)
Attorney Discipline for Letter to Prefect
This provision was used to justify imposing the costs on the lawyer who caused the investigation to be opened.
7.2015 · vd (art. 61 al. 3 LPAv)
Attorney Disciplinary Investigation Closure Due to Evolving Client Capacity and Protective Actions
This provision was cited in the dispositive section regarding the allocation of costs, stating they are borne by the State.
8.2015 · vd (art. 61 al. 1 LPAv)
Lawyer Sanctioned for Aggressive Complaints Against Official and Judge
This article governs the imposition of costs in disciplinary proceedings, which were assigned to the lawyer in the final order.
2.2015 · vd (art. 61 al. 1er LPAv)
Attorney Independence Violation in Successive Representation Against Former Personal Adversary
This provision was used to order the lawyer to bear the costs of the proceedings because his conduct provoked the opening of the inquiry.
D.cision.2014.1137 · vd (art. 61 al. 1er LPAv)
Attorney Discipline for Unregistered Representation and Lack of Insurance
Applied to determine the amount of costs to be charged to L._______.
D.cision.2013.1080 · vd (art. 61 al. 1er LPAv)
Attorney Discipline for Coercive Demand Regarding Medical Records
This provision was cited to impose the costs of the proceedings on the lawyer W.______.
D.cision.2013.1079 · vd (art. 61 al. 1er LPAv)
Attorney Discipline for Impugning Opposing Counsel's Integrity
This provision was cited as the basis for charging the costs of the case to the attorney L._____.
D.cision.2012.1094 · vd (art. 61 al. 1 LPAv)
Cantonal Chamber of Lawyers v. Lawyer (Legal Aid Billing)
This provision governs the decision on the costs of the proceedings, which are charged to the lawyer.
D.cision.2011.804 · vd (art. 61 al. 1 LPAv)
Attorney Discipline for Negligence and Failure to Communicate
This article is cited in the reasoning for imposing the costs of the proceedings on the lawyer.
D.cision.2011.802 · vd (art. 61 al. 1er LPAv)
Lawyer Sanctioned for Threatening Letter to Third Party in Divorce Case
This procedural rule was cited to justify placing the costs of the proceedings on the lawyer who caused the inquiry to be opened.
D.cision.2011.801 · vd (art. 61 al. 1er LPAv)
Attorney Disbarment for Client Fund Misappropriation and Fraud
This provision was applied to charge the lawyer with the costs of the decision.
D.cision.2010.205 · vd (art. 61 al. 1 LPAv)
Excessive Attorney Fees and Misleading Billing Practices
The costs of the decision are charged to the lawyer Q. as a consequence of the ruling.