173.61 LJT

CH-VD

Art. 3 LOI sur la juridiction du travail (LJT) - Principe

Chapitre I

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (12 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 3 LJT · Principe

1. Il ne peut être dérogé à la compétence du tribunal des prud'hommes que par une clause compromissoire liant les parties et insérée dans une convention collective de travail. Les articles 10 et 23 de la loi sur le service de l'emploi et la location de service [A] sont réservés.

2. Les litiges entre une collectivité publique ou un établissement public et un fonctionnaire nommé ne sont pas soumis aux dispositions de la présente loi.

3. Sous réserve de dispositions contraire, notamment celles prévues par la loi sur le personnel de l'Etat de Vaud [D] , les personnes engagées par contrat d'une collectivité publique ou d'un établissement public peuvent saisir les autorités compétentes en matière de juridiction du travail, conformément aux présentes dispositions.

← Art. 2 LJT sur la juridiction du travail (LJT) - Objet Art. 4 LJT →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (11)

GE.2021.0027 · vd (Art. 3 al. 3 LJT)

Employment Contract Termination Jurisdiction Dispute

Cited in the reasoning to confirm that disputes concerning an employee engaged by contract fall under the jurisdiction of the labour courts, leading to the inadmissibility of the appeal before this court.

GE.2020.0172 · vd (art. 3 al. 3 LJT)

Director Employment Termination Contractual vs. Administrative Dispute

The court used this provision to establish that the litigation concerning the termination of the contract falls under the jurisdiction of the labour courts.

HC.2019.45 · vd (Art. 3 LJT)

Appeal Regarding Jurisdiction Over Employment Contract Debt

This provision was explicitly cited in the text to define the scope of competence regarding labor jurisdiction, which was the core issue resolved in the decision.

GE.2016.0156 · vd (art. 2 et 3 LJT)

Municipality Worker Contract Termination Appeal Dismissed Over Jurisdiction

Cited in the reasoning to determine that labor jurisdiction (civil) is competent, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I, II, III).

GE.2016.0156 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 LJT)

Municipality Worker Contract Termination Appeal Dismissed Over Jurisdiction

Cited in the reasoning regarding the primacy of the labour jurisdiction law over administrative recourse provisions, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I, II, III).

GE.2016.0156 · vd (art. 3 al. 2 LJT)

Municipality Worker Contract Termination Appeal Dismissed Over Jurisdiction

Cited in the reasoning to exclude the case from the non-application to civil servants, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I, II, III).

GE.2016.0156 · vd (art. 3 al. 3 LJT)

Municipality Worker Contract Termination Appeal Dismissed Over Jurisdiction

Cited in the reasoning to classify the appellant as an employee engaged by contract by a public entity, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I, II, III).

GE.2016.0100 · vd (art. 3 LJT)

Jurisdiction Dispute Over Private Law Employment Contract Termination by Municipality

Cited in the reasoning to establish that the dispute falls under the jurisdiction of the labor courts, which justifies the administrative appeal being inadmissible.

HC.2016.196 · vd (Art. 3 al. 1 LJT)

Liability for Unpaid Wages Against Individuals Operating an Unregistered Company

Cited in the preamble, justifying the imperative nature of the Labor Court's jurisdiction.

HC.2013.837 · vd (Art. 3 al. 2 LJT)

Municipality Hiring Dispute: Public Service Law Jurisdiction Upheld

Used to determine that the dispute concerning the engagement of a civil servant by a public entity is not subject to the Labour Jurisdiction Act.

HC.2009.261 · vd (art. 3 al. 3 LJT)

Municipality Employment Contract Dispute Jurisdiction

This provision is the main legal ground for reforming the first instance decision to confirm the competence of the Labour Tribunal for an employee engaged by contract by a public entity.