Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
173.61 LJT CH-VD

Art. 2 LOI sur la juridiction du travail (LJT) - Juridiction

Chapitre I
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (12 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 2 LJT · Juridiction

1. Ces contestations relèvent des tribunaux suivants

a. du tribunal des prud'hommes, lorsque la valeur litigieuse n'excède pas 30'000 francs ;

b. du tribunal d'arrondissement, lorsque la valeur litigieuse est supérieure à 30'000 francs et n'excède pas 100'000 francs ;

c. de la Chambre patrimoniale cantonale lorsque la valeur litigieuse est supérieure à ce montant.

2. Lorsque la LEg [B] est seule applicable, le tribunal de prud'hommes est compétent, indépendamment de la valeur litigieuse, si la demande ne comporte aucune conclusion tendant au paiement d'une somme d'argent.

← Art. 1 LJT sur la juridiction du travail (LJT) - Objet Art. 3 LJT →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (9)

10----------- · vd (Art. 2 al. 1 let. a et 3 al. 1 LJT)
Jurisdictional Challenge to Summary Procedure for Garnished Wage Debt
This provision establishes the mandatory jurisdiction of the labour court for salary claims under 30,000 fr., which served as the basis for deeming the lower court incompetent and confirming the inadmissibility of the claim.
HC.2021.804 · vd (art. 2 LJT)
Tax Reimbursement Dispute: Jurisdiction Between Labor Tribunal and Justice of the Peace
Cited alongside art. 113 al. 1bis LOJV in the legal reasoning section to distinguish between jurisdiction matters (Labour Tribunal vs Justice of the Peace), though not explicitly ordered, it is included as the decision references LJT provisions in the preamble headers, indicating their relevance to the scope of the decision.
GE.2020.0172 · vd (art. 2 LJT)
Director Employment Termination Contractual vs. Administrative Dispute
The court cited this provision in its reasoning to determine that the dispute falls under the jurisdiction of the labour courts.
HC.2018.1017 · vd (art. 2 al. 1 let. a LJT)
Jurisdictional Competence in Labor Claim Involving Certificate Value
The court confirmed the lower court's finding that the labour court was competent ratione valoris because the litigation value did not exceed 30,000 fr.
GE.2016.0156 · vd (art. 2 et 3 LJT)
Municipality Worker Contract Termination Appeal Dismissed Over Jurisdiction
Cited in the reasoning to determine that labor jurisdiction (civil) is competent, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I, II, III).
GE.2016.0100 · vd (art. 2 LJT)
Jurisdiction Dispute Over Private Law Employment Contract Termination by Municipality
Cited in the reasoning to establish which courts have jurisdiction over labor disputes, reinforcing the administrative court's lack of jurisdiction.
HC.2015.678 · vd (Art. 2 al. 1 LJT)
Jurisdictional Challenge Over Withdrawn Claim Value
This provision defines the competence of the specialized labor courts based on the value in dispute, which was central to the initial judgment being appealed.
HC.2010.333 · vd (Art. 2 al. 1 let. a LJT)
Employee v. Employer: Unpaid Salary and Notice Period Dispute
Cited in the reasoning to establish the jurisdiction of the labour court based on the dispute value.
HC.2010.334 · vd (Art. 2 al. 1 let. a LJT)
Former Employee v. Employer: Wrongful Termination and Wage Claims
Cited to establish the jurisdiction of the court of first instance based on the value in dispute.