Art. 66 LOI sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD) - Principes

PS.2022.0044 · vd (art. 66 al. 2 LPA-VD)

Appeal Regarding Restitution of Social Benefits and Legal Aid Refusal

Although not explicitly in the final orders, Art. 56 al. 2 LPA-VD is cited in the reasoning leading to the decision on reduced costs (Art. 55 al. 1 and 56 al. 2 LPA-VD mentioned in the final reasoning leading to order V).

PE.2021.0046 · vd (art. 66 al. 2 LPA-VD)

Polish National's Permit Application Transfer to Administrative Opposition Procedure

The appeal was declared inadmissible because the remedy of opposition (réclamation) before the SPOP had not been exhausted.

GE.2020.0235 · vd (art. 66ss LPA-VD)

License Withdrawal Appeal Following Remand and Proof of Timely Objection

Cited as the applicable law for the authority to rule on the reclamation once the appeal is admitted.

CR.2016.0075 · vd (Art. 66 al. 1 LPA-VD)

Driver License Provisional Seizure Appeal Inadmissibility

This article, which establishes the possibility of a reclamation, is relevant because the court ultimately transmitted the appeal as a reclamation, implying the need to exhaust this procedural step.

CR.2016.0053 · vd (art. 66 ss LPA-VD)

License Revocation Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Exhaust Preliminary Complaint Procedure

Cited in the reasoning as the applicable procedure for driver's license withdrawal decisions (though not explicitly in the dispositive, it underlies the inadmissibility finding and subsequent transmission based on art. 7 LPA-VD).

PE.2016.0072 · vd (Art. 66 LPA-VD)

Immigration Appeal Dismissed: Insufficient Grounds for Reconsideration of Family Reunification Permit

Cited in the reasoning to describe the grounds for requesting reexamination, but not in the final orders.

PE.2016.0072 · vd (Art. 66 al. 1 a contrario LPA-VD)

Immigration Appeal Dismissed: Insufficient Grounds for Reconsideration of Family Reunification Permit

Cited in the reasoning for not allocating costs.

FI.2015.0145 · vd (art. 66 ss LPA-VD)

Driver's License Withdrawal and Administrative Fees Following Incarceration

Cited in the reasoning to explain why reclamation was not the appropriate initial procedure for the fee decision.

FI.2014.0118 · vd (Art. 66 ss LPA-VD)

Vehicle Insurance Fee Collection Costs Appeal Upheld Due to Untimely Challenge of Initial Fees

Cited in the reasoning to distinguish the type of decision and confirm jurisdiction based on Art. 92 al. 1 LPA-VD.

FI.2014.0099 · vd (art. 66 al. 2 LPA-VD)

Tax Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies

Cited in the reasoning to establish that the appeal was inadmissible because the preliminary administrative appeal procedure (réclamation) was not exhausted.

CR.2012.0075 · vd (art. 66 al. 2 LPA-VD)

Driver's License Revocation Without Prior Administrative Appeal

Cited as the legal basis for deeming the recourse inadmissible because the claimant had not exhausted the remedy of administrative objection.

CR.2012.0076 · vd (art. 66 al. 2 LPA-VD)

Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies

This specific article was cited in the reasoning to confirm that parties cannot appeal before exhausting the reclamation procedure, supporting the decision to declare the appeal inadmissible.

FI.2012.0027 · vd (Art. 66, 49, 55, 91 et 99 LPA-VD)

Property Owner Appeals Cadastral Survey Cost Obligation After Sale

Cited in the context of imposing court costs on the appellant who lost the appeal (Art. 66 LTF equivalent for costs, referencing specific LPA-VD articles regarding costs and lack of indemnity).

PE.2010.0620 · vd (Art. 66 [LPA-VD] or similar local provision for costs)

Judicial Review of Inadmissible Reconsideration Request for Residence Permit Denial

Although item III orders costs, it does not explicitly cite the governing Cantonal procedural article (like Art. 66 LPA-VD or equivalent for costs in the Cantonal review) in the dispositive itself, only the resulting order.

CR.2009.0007 · vd (Art. 66 al. 1 LPA-VD)

Driver's License Test Challenge Admissibility

This article, establishing the opening of the réclamation procedure when a law provides for it, was cited in the analysis of the applicable remedies.