Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
173.36 LPA-VDLJPA CH-VD

Art. 61 LOI sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD) - Décisions non pécuniaires

Chapitre II, Section IX
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (122 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 61 LPA-VD · Décisions non pécuniaires

1. Pour exécuter les décisions non pécuniaires, l'autorité peut procéder

a. à l'exécution directe contre la personne de l'obligé ou ses biens ;

b. à l'exécution par un tiers mandaté, aux frais de l'obligé.

2. L'autorité peut au besoin recourir à l'aide de la police cantonale ou communale.

3. Avant de recourir à un moyen de contrainte, l'autorité en menace l'obligé et lui impartit un délai approprié pour s'exécuter. Elle attire son attention sur les sanctions qu'il peut encourir.

4. S'il y a péril en la demeure, l'autorité peut procéder à l'exécution sans en avertir préalablement l'obligé.

5. Les frais mis à charge de l'obligé sont fixés par décision de l'autorité.

← Art. 60 LPA-VD sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD) - Objet Art. 62 LPA-VD →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (35)

AC.2025.0113 · vd (art. 61 al. 4 LPA-VD)
Property Owners Appeal Vehicle Removal Order for Lack of Zoning Authorization
Cited in the reasoning to address the appellants' challenge regarding potential immediate execution by substitution, although the court concluded this was not applicable to the decision being reviewed.
AC.2024.0047 · vd (art. 61 al. 1 let. b LPA-VD)
Property Owner Fails to Appeal Remedial Work Order, Cannot Challenge Proportionality Later
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the basis for execution by substitution, which is the decision under appeal.
AC.2024.0047 · vd (art. 61 al. 3 LPA-VD)
Property Owner Fails to Appeal Remedial Work Order, Cannot Challenge Proportionality Later
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the phases of enforcement, relevant to the contested decision.
AC.2024.0047 · vd (art. 61 al. 5 LPA-VD)
Property Owner Fails to Appeal Remedial Work Order, Cannot Challenge Proportionality Later
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the phases of enforcement and the possibility of contesting costs.
GE.2024.0119 · vd (Art. 61 al. 3 LPA-VD)
Petitioner v. Agricultural Authority (Rottweiler Compliance Appeal)
This provision, concerning enforcement measures, was cited to determine that the contested act was a mere formal reminder not subject to appeal.
FI.2022.0145 · vd (Art. 61 al. 4 LPA-VD)
Property Owner Water Repair Cost Allocation Dispute
Cited to justify the authority's ability to carry out necessary work without prior notice due to the emergency (peril in delay).
AC.2022.0144 · vd (art. 61 al. 1 let. b LPA-VD)
Greenhouse Dismantling Deadline Appeal Rejection
This provision regarding execution by a mandated third party was cited to contextualize the nature of the decision under appeal (the final deadline notice).
AC.2021.0306 · vd (art. 61 LPA-VD)
Construction Company v. Municipality over Contaminated Soil Removal Order
Cited extensively in the reasoning section concerning the execution of non-pecuniary decisions by substitution (ex-écution par un tiers mandaté).
AC.2021.0306 · vd (art. 61 al. 3 LPA-VD)
Construction Company v. Municipality over Contaminated Soil Removal Order
Cited extensively in the reasoning section regarding the procedural steps for execution by substitution.
AC.2021.0306 · vd (art. 61 al. 5 LPA-VD)
Construction Company v. Municipality over Contaminated Soil Removal Order
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the decision on incurred costs after execution.
AC.2022.0094 · vd (art. 61 LPA-VD)
Owner's Appeal of Unpermitted Shed Demolition Order Denied Due to No Prescription Period for Out-of-Zone Construction
The court confirmed the execution order based on this article regarding enforcement procedures, specifically execution by substitution (art. 61 al. 1 let. b LPA-VD) referenced in the contested decision.
AC.2022.0094 · vd (art. 61 al. 5 LPA-VD)
Owner's Appeal of Unpermitted Shed Demolition Order Denied Due to No Prescription Period for Out-of-Zone Construction
Cited in relation to the final phase of execution by substitution, concerning the decision on costs, although costs were ultimately determined by cantonal rules in the dispositive.
AC.2019.0326 · vd (art. 61 al. 1 let. b LPA-VD)
Municipality Bus Evacuation and Destruction Order Compliance Dispute
This provision mandates the means of execution by a mandated third party (exécution par un tiers mandaté), which is the basis for the challenged substitution execution order (order III).
AC.2019.0326 · vd (art. 61 al. 3 LPA-VD)
Municipality Bus Evacuation and Destruction Order Compliance Dispute
This provision sets out the requirement for a prior warning (sommation) and setting a deadline before resorting to enforcement measures, which was discussed in relation to the validity of the enforcement decision (order III).
AC.2021.0067 · vd (art. 61 LPA-VD)
Appeal Against Forced Execution of Demolition Order on Agricultural Land
Cited as the regulation concerning the enforcement of non-pecuniary decisions, specifically authorizing enforcement by a mandated third party at the obligor's expense, which is the basis for the contested execution by substitution.