173.36
LPA-VDLJPA
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 42 LOI sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD) - Contenu [ 4 ]
Chapitre II, Section VII
Art. 42 LPA-VD · Contenu [ 4 ]
1. La décision contient les indications suivantes, exprimées en termes clairs et précis
a. le nom de l'autorité qui a statué et sa composition s'il s'agit d'une autorité collégiale ;
b. le nom des parties et de leurs mandataires ;
c. les faits, les règles juridiques et les motifs sur lesquels elle s'appuie ;
d. le dispositif ;
e. la date et la signature ;
f. l'indication des voies de droit ordinaires ouvertes à son encontre, du délai pour les utiliser et de l'autorité compétente pour en connaître.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (133)
AC.2025.0189 · vd (art. 42 let. c LPA-VD)
Property Owner v. Road Authority (Building Permit Refusal)
Mandates that decisions clearly state the facts, legal rules, and reasoning.
AC.2025.0044 · vd (art. 42 LPA-VD)
Property Owners v. Municipal Planning Service (Admissibility of Appeal Regarding Tree Planting Refusal)
The court instructed the Municipal Council to render a motivated decision compliant with this article upon transmittal.
AC.2022.0138 · vd (Art. 42 al. 1 let. c LPA-VD)
Property Owner Appeal Regarding Unauthorized Construction and Obstruction of Inspection
Cited by the appellant in their submissions, but the court's final order does not explicitly rely on it for its own ruling.
AC.2023.0343 · vd (art. 42 LPA-VD)
Property Owners Appeal Multi-Unit Building Permit in Protected Zone
Cited in the reasoning regarding the duty to motivate decisions, but since this article does not appear in the dispositive orders I-IV, it is excluded.
AC.2023.0429 · vd (art. 42 let. c LPA-VD)
Landowners Appeal Denial of Building Permit for ISOS Site Due to Impending Zoning Revision
Cited in the context of examining the complaint regarding insufficient reasoning, although the court ultimately found the reasoning sufficient.
AC.2023.0387 · vd (Art. 42 LPA-VD)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit and Tree Removal
This article, concerning the obligation to motivate a decision, is cited in the reasoning but not in the dispositive orders (I to IV).
GE.2023.0069 · vd (art. 42 let. c LPA-VD)
Calf-Fattening Operation Drug Storage and Hygiene Compliance Appeal
Cited in the reasoning regarding the court's duty not to reconstruct the decision, but not explicitly used in the dispositive orders (I-VI).
AC.2023.0350 · vd (art. 42 let. c LPA-VD)
Municipal Building Permit Upheld in Winegrower's House Renovation Appeal
Cited implicitly in reasoning section 3aa as related to the duty to motivate the decision.
AC.2024.0016 · vd (art. 42 let. c LPA-VD)
Applicant v. Municipality regarding Mobile Station Permit Refusal
Cited when discussing the requirement for administrative decisions to state facts, legal rules, and grounds, in relation to the municipality's refusal reason.
GE.2023.0126 · vd (art. 42 let. c LPA-VD)
Appeal Dismissed Regarding Teacher Training Internship Failure and Evaluation Dispute
Cited in conjunction with the constitutional right to be heard concerning the requirement for the authority to motivate its decision.
PS.2023.0063 · vd (art. 42 let. c LPA-VD)
Appeal on Restitution of Family Benefits Due to Insufficient Justification of Income Assessment
Cited in conjunction with the obligation to motivate the decision, which was violated and led to the annulment.
GE.2023.0151 · vd (Art. 42 LPA-VD)
Appellant v. Municipality Regarding Advertising Display Authorization Refusal
The reference to this article is implicit in the annulment and referral order, as the original decisions were flawed for lacking motivation as required by this article.
AC.2023.0142 · vd (Art. 42 let. c LPA-VD)
Property Owner v. Municipality (Stabilization Order and Neighbor Restoration)
Mentioned in the context of the requirement for the authority to motivate its decision, linked to the right to be heard.
PE.2023.0037 · vd (art. 42 let. c LPA-VD)
Husband's Debt and Family Residence Permit Conversion Appeal
Cited as part of the justification for annulling the decision and remitting the case due to incompleteness regarding the wife and children.
AC.2022.0301 · vd (art. 42 let. c LPA-VD)
Appeal Dismissed: Challenge to Multi-Unit Development Approval Despite Objections to Basement, Parking, and Landscaping
This procedural provision was cited alongside Art. 29 Cst. to define the requirement for the authority to motivate its decision as part of the right to be heard.