Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
173.36 LPA-VDLJPA CH-VD

Art. 39 LOI sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD) - Amende

Chapitre II, Section VI
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (122 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 39 LPA-VD · Amende

1. Quiconque engage une procédure téméraire, use de procédés abusifs, ou perturbe l'avancement d'une procédure est passible d'une amende de 1'000 francs au plus et, en cas de récidive, de 3'000 francs au plus.

2. L'autorité compétente pour statuer sur le fond l'est également pour prononcer l'amende.

← Art. 38 LPA-VD sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD) - Objet Art. 40 LPA-VD →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (30)

GE.2024.0141 · vd (art. 39 LPA-VD)
Recourse for Denial of Justice Against State Chancellery Regarding Information Request Denied
Cited to warn the appellants about potential fines for future vexatious proceedings.
PS.2021.0016 · vd (art. 39 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Benefit Repayment for Undeclared Work
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the applicant's allegations bordering on recklessness, which relates to the cost decision in order III.
AM.10.20.30.2020 · vd (art. 39 LPA-VD)
Appeal Dismissed Regarding Unpaid Health Insurance Premiums and Sanctions Imposed
Cited in the dispositive's reasoning as the basis for imposing a penalty order (amende d'ordre) against the representative.
AC.2020.0086 · vd (Art. 39 LPA-VD)
Chalet Alterations Removal Order Upheld Despite Partial Appeal Success
Cited in the reasoning concerning the municipality's request for a fine, but not explicitly in the final orders (I, II, III).
AC.2020.0086 · vd (art. 39 LPA-VD)
Chalet Alterations Removal Order Upheld Despite Partial Appeal Success
Cited in the reasoning concerning the municipality's request for a fine, but not explicitly in the final orders (I, II, III).
PS.2019.0049 · vd (art. 39 LPA-VD)
Applicant's Appeal on Social Assistance Calculation and Legal Aid Refusal Upheld
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the potential sanction for temerarious procedure, which relates to the outcome of the costs/fines provision cited in the dispositive.
GE.2019.0229 · vd (art. 39 LPA-VD)
Asylum Seekers v. Population Service (SPOP) Appeal Re: Denial of Justice and Data Rectification
Used to warn the applicants about potential future judicial costs or fines for filing inadmissible or abusive proceedings.
FI.2018.0197 · vd (art. 39 LPA-VD)
Taxpayer Challenge to Wealth Tax Assessment Based on Allegedly Fraudulent Share Valuation Upheld
Cited to formally warn the appellant about potential fines for reckless litigation.
7.2019 · vd (art. 39 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Divorce Fee Obligation and Conflict of Interest Allegation Against Counsel
Applied to impose an administrative fine of 500 fr. on M._______ for adopting a reckless approach.
PE.2018.0209 · vd (art. 39 LPA-VD)
Family's Appeal of Deportation Order Following Fourth Reconsideration Denial Rejected
The court expressly drew attention to this provision regarding potential sanctions for reckless proceedings.
PE.2017.0454 · vd (art. 39 LPA-VD)
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Untimely Filing After Personal Service
Cited in the reasoning section to warn the appellant about penalties for reckless procedure.
PE.2017.0028 · vd (Art. 39 LPA-VD)
Asylum Reconsideration Denial for Lack of Determinative New Facts
The court imposed a fine of five hundred francs on the appellant under this article for initiating a purely dilatory appeal.
PE.2016.0297 · vd (Art. 39 LPA-VD)
Foreign National Deportation Appeal Dismissed for Repetitive and Dilatory Claims
The court explicitly imposed a fine on the appellant based on this provision in order V.
PS.2016.0046 · vd (art. 39 LPA-VD)
Social Assistance Appeal Mootness Due to Housing Acquisition
This provision was cited to warn the appellant about the potential penalties for filing a vexatious proceeding in the dispositive section.
PE.2015.0400 · vd (art. 39 LPA-VD)
Asylum Seeker's Reconsideration Denial Upheld Due to Dilatory Sixth Procedure
This article was used to condemn the appellant to a fine for initiating a purely dilatory appeal.