173.36
LPA-VDLJPA
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 27 LOI sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD) - Forme [ 6 ]
Chapitre II, Section II
Art. 27 LPA-VD · Forme [ 6 ]
1. La procédure est en principe écrite.
2. Lorsque les besoins de l'instruction l'exigent, l'autorité peut tenir audience.
3. Lorsque les circonstances l'exigent, le Tribunal cantonal peut ordonner des débats.
4. L'autorité renvoie les écrits peu clairs, incomplets, prolixes, inconvenants ou qui ne satisfont pas aux conditions de forme posées par la loi.
5. Elle impartit un bref délai à leurs auteurs pour les corriger. Les écrits qui ne sont pas produits à nouveau dans ce délai, ou dont les vices ne sont pas corrigés, sont réputés retirés. L'autorité informe les auteurs de ces conséquences.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (350)
FI.2024.0171 · vd (art. 27 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Tax Assessment Appeal Timeliness Dispute
Cited in the reasoning section (Considerant 2.a) regarding the written nature of administrative proceedings, but not used in the operative part (dispositif).
PE.2025.0097 · vd (art. 27 al. 4 et 5 LPA-VD)
Administrative Appeal Deemed Withdrawn Due to Failure to Submit Contested Decision
Cited as the consequence (appeal deemed withdrawn) when the appellant fails to follow the instruction to produce the contested decision.
PS.2025.0014 · vd (art. 27 LPA-VD)
Appeal Inadmissibility Regarding Reimbursement of Social Assistance Benefits
This provision was cited in the reasoning regarding the failure to produce the decision attacked.
PS.2025.0001 · vd (art. 27 al. 4 et 5, 1ère phrase, LPA-VD)
Appeal Struck for Uncorrected Signature Validly Notified by Mail
This provision, cited regarding the authority's duty to request regularization of defective writings, justified the preliminary request sent to the appellant.
PS.2025.0001 · vd (art. 27 al. 5, 2ème et 3ème phrases, LPA-VD)
Appeal Struck for Uncorrected Signature Validly Notified by Mail
This provision was cited to confirm that the administrative authority correctly warned the appellant that failure to remedy the defect would lead to the appeal being deemed withdrawn.
AC.2022.0084 · vd (art. 27 al. 4 LPA-VD)
Car Wash Expansion Permit Appeal Upheld with Noise Restrictions
Cited implicitly when the court refuses to refer the file back to the appellant for completion after finding the appeal compliant with formal requirements.
AC.2025.0008 · vd (art. 27 al. 4 et 5 LPA-VD)
Appeal Deemed Withdrawn for Failure to Complete Filing Requirements
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for deeming the appeal withdrawn due to failure to correct deficiencies.
PE.2024.0193 · vd (Art. 27 al. 5 LPA-VD)
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Non-Compliance
The appeal is deemed withdrawn based on the failure to correct the omission (lack of signature) within the set deadline.
PS.2024.0066 · vd (art. 27 LPA-VD)
Appellant v. Employment Authority on Timeliness of Signed Appeal
Although cited in the reasoning regarding the required signature, this provision was not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive orders I, II, or III.
GE.2023.0069 · vd (art. 27 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Calf-Fattening Operation Drug Storage and Hygiene Compliance Appeal
Cited in the reasoning regarding the written nature of the procedure, but not explicitly used in the dispositive orders (I-VI).
AC.2023.0130 · vd (art. 27 LPA-VD)
Neighbors v. Municipal Decision on Building Permit Regarding Visibility and Traffic Safety
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the procedure before the Court is principally written.
EF.2023.0001 · vd (art. 27 al. 4 et 5 LPA-VD)
Property Tax Assessment Appeal Regarding Rental Value Calculation
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the procedural conformity of the appeal, which was verified before entering into the merits.
PS.2023.0046 · vd (art. 27 LPA-VD)
Housing Allowance Denial for Young Adult Living with Parents Upheld
Cited in relation to the written nature of administrative procedure.
FI.2023.0162 · vd (art. 27 al. 4 LPA-VD)
Taxpayer Appeal on Capital Gains Classification and Allocation Dismissed for Procedural Defects
This procedural article was referenced in the reasoning explaining the court's power to return unclear or incomplete writings for correction, which led to the inadmissibility decision.
FI.2023.0162 · vd (art. 27 al. 5 LPA-VD)
Taxpayer Appeal on Capital Gains Classification and Allocation Dismissed for Procedural Defects
This procedural article was referenced in the reasoning to justify that writings not corrected within the time limit are deemed withdrawn, leading to inadmissibility.