173.36
LPA-VDLJPA
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 25 LOI sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD) - Suspension
Chapitre II, Section I
Art. 25 LPA-VD · Suspension
1. L'autorité peut, d'office ou sur requête, suspendre la procédure pour de justes motifs, notamment lorsque la décision à prendre dépend de l'issue d'une autre procédure ou pourrait s'en trouver influencée d'une manière déterminante.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (55)
PE.2024.0071 · vd (art. 25 LPA-VD)
Kosovar National's Appeal Against Revocation of Residence Permit Based on Fraudulent Nationality Claim Rejected
Cited to explain the possibility for the authority to suspend the administrative procedure for just cause.
FI.2024.0030 · vd (Art. 25 LPA-VD)
Taxpayer Suspension Appeal Dismissed Due to Speculative Harm and Prescription Deadline
The court implicitly used this article to confirm the administrative authority's decision to reject the suspension request based on the weighing of interests.
AC.2023.0438 · vd (Art. 25 LPA-VD)
Property Owners v. Municipality on Permit Suspension Due to Rezoning Initiative
This provision, cited by the suspended decision, was the basis for the administrative suspension, which the court ultimately found inappropriate and implicitly overruled through the admission of the appeal.
AC.2020.0193 · vd (art. 25 LPA-VD)
Appeal Against Refused Preliminary Building Permit for Terraced Villas Due to Cantonal Authorization Deficiencies
This article on the suspension of proceedings is cited by the appellant, but the court uses its underlying principles to reject the request for continued suspension.
GE.2023.0104 · vd (Art. 25 LPA-VD)
Company v. Administrative Authority (COVID-19 Grant Revocation)
Governs the court's decision to reject the request for suspension of the proceedings.
529----------- · vd (Art. 25 LPA-VD)
Convict's Appeal on Suspended Family Leave Due to Undisclosed Pornography Use
This provision was explicitly cited in the annulment order (II) as the legal basis for the suspended procedure being overturned.
AC.2022.0257 · vd (art. 25 LPA-VD)
Municipal Order Upholding Basement Apartment Closure Due to Unpermitted Change of Use and Regulatory Violations
Cited in the reasoning for the power to suspend proceedings, justifying the rejection of the suspension request in Order I (confirming earlier decision).
AC.2022.0257 · vd (art. 25, 55, 91 et 99 LPA-VD)
Municipal Order Upholding Basement Apartment Closure Due to Unpermitted Change of Use and Regulatory Violations
Cited for imposing judicial fees and awarding costs/indemnities to the respondent.
PS.2022.0026 · vd (art. 25 LPA-VD)
Administrative Suspension of Child Support Advance Payments Pending Clarification of Entitlements
The court confirmed that the administrative authority was justified in suspending the review procedure based on this article, as the decision depended on the outcome of a civil matter.
AC.2021.0230 · vd (Art. 25 LPA-VD)
Municipal Building Permit Appeals Dismissed Regarding Residential Construction
Cited to reject the request for suspension of proceedings.
Arr.t.2022.383 · vd (Art. 25 LPA-VD)
Appeal Against Dependent Employment Classification of Transportation Worker; Stay Pending Federal Tribunal Rulings
The court used this provision as the legal basis for suspending the procedure.
Plainte.2021.32 · vd (Art. 25 LPA-VD)
Appeal Regarding Suspension Denial and Evidence Requests in Property Seizure Enforcement Upheld
This article was used to analyze the merits of the appellant's request for suspension of the administrative procedure.
AC.2020.0289 · vd (art. 25 LPA-VD)
Appeal Concerning Administrative Order to Cease Unpermitted Site Storage and Restoration
Cited in the reasoning regarding the conditions for procedural suspension, which the court rejected.
AC.2020.0309 · vd (art. 25 LPA-VD)
Property Owner v. Municipality (Excessive Apartment Units)
Cited in the reasoning for rejecting the request for suspension of proceedings.
AVS.30.19.12.2021 · vd (Art. 25 LPA-VD)
Administrator Liability for Unpaid Social Security Contributions Due to Gross Negligence
The court rejected the appellant's request for suspension of proceedings based on this provision.