173.36
LPA-VDLJPA
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 22 LOI sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD) - Restitution
Chapitre I, Section IV
Art. 22 LPA-VD · Restitution
1. Le délai peut être restitué lorsque la partie ou son mandataire établit qu'il a été empêché, sans faute de sa part, d'agir dans le délai fixé.
2. La demande motivée de restitution doit être présentée dans les dix jours à compter de celui où l'empêchement a cessé. Dans ce même délai, le requérant doit accomplir l'acte omis. Sur requête, un délai supplémentaire lui est accordé pour compléter cet acte, si des motifs suffisants le justifient.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (151)
PS.2025.0058 · vd (Art. 22 al. 2 LPA-VD)
Recipient v. Administrative Authority: Deadline Extension for Administrative Appeal Due to Incapacity
The conditions for restitution of the time limit for appeal were met by the appellant.
FI.2025.0116 · vd (art. 22 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Taxpayer Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing Despite Reliance on Employee Assurance
This provision was cited in the reasoning leading to the dismissal of the request for reinstatement of the deadline, which is part of the overall decision to reject the appeal as inadmissible.
FI.2025.0113 · vd (art. 22 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Taxpayers v. Tax Assessment Rejection: Admissibility of Appeal Cost Advance Restitution
Cited as the legal basis for the conditions for granting the restitution of the time limit due to being prevented from acting without fault.
FI.2025.0083 · vd (art. 22 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Taxpayer Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Objection to Tax Assessment Inadmissibility Ruling
Cited as the provision governing the restitution of procedural deadlines (although restitution was denied).
FI.2024.0171 · vd (art. 22 LPA-VD)
Tax Assessment Appeal Timeliness Dispute
Cited in the reasoning section (Considerant 7.d) in the context of the appellant not asserting any grounds for restitution of time limits, but not used in the operative part (dispositif).
AC.2025.0137 · vd (Art. 22 LPA-VD)
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Late Fee Payment
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the conditions for granting a time extension, which is the subject of Order I, although the article itself is not directly cited in the final orders (I, II, III, IV).
FI.2025.0075 · vd (art. 22 LPA-VD)
Tax Appeal Inadmissibility Upheld Due to Untimely Fee Payment and Failed Restitution Request
Cited in the reasoning concerning the rejection of the request for restitutio in integrum (restitution of time limits).
PS.2024.0066 · vd (art. 22 LPA-VD)
Appellant v. Employment Authority on Timeliness of Signed Appeal
Although cited in the reasoning regarding the request for reinstatement of time limits, this provision was not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive orders I, II, or III.
PS.2024.0062 · vd (art. 22 LPA-VD)
Appeal Deadline Restitution Refused Due to Inadequate Proof of Incapacity
Used in the operative part (Order I) to reject the request for restitution of the time limit.
GE.2024.0295 · vd (art. 22 LPA-VD)
Academic Failure Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing
The rejection of the appeal is based on the finding that the grounds cited did not justify the restitution of the appeal deadline under this provision.
PE.2024.0123 · vd (Art. 22 LPA-VD)
Foreign National's Expulsion Appeal Inadmissibility Upheld Despite Mandatary's Fault
This article governed the substantive law applied in the dispositive (Order I) regarding the dismissal of the request for restoration of time limits.
AC.2024.0240 · vd (Art. 22 LPA-VD)
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Cost Advance Payment
The court rejected the request for the restitution of the deadline based on this article concerning the conditions for granting a time extension.
GE.2024.0201 · vd (Art. 22 LPA-VD)
Student Appeal Regarding Inadmissible University Review Due to Unpaid Administrative Fee
Cited to analyze and ultimately reject the possibility of a time extension restitution, as the non-payment was considered voluntary.
FI.2024.0064 · vd (art. 22 LPA-VD)
Tax Recourse Inadmissibility Due to Missed Security Deposit Deadline
Cited in the reasoning concerning the conditions for restitution of a deadline due to objective or subjective impediment.
RE.2024.0003 · vd (Art. 22 LPA-VD)
Appeal on Procedural Cost Payment Deadline Restitution Refused
The court relied on this article to reject the request for restitution of the deadline, finding that the objective requirement for non-faulty hindrance was not met.