173.36
LPA-VDLJPA
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 13 LOI sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD) - Qualité de partie
Chapitre I, Section III
Art. 13 LPA-VD · Qualité de partie
1. Ont qualité de parties en procédure administrative
a. les personnes susceptibles d'être atteintes par la décision à rendre et qui participent à la procédure ;
b. les personnes ou autorités auxquelles la loi confère la qualité de partie ;
c. les personnes ou autorités qui disposent d'un moyen de droit à l'encontre de la décision attaquée ;
d. les personnes intervenant dans une procédure d'enquête publique ou de consultation.
2. Sauf disposition expresse contraire, le dénonciateur n'a pas qualité de partie.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (20)
GE.2024.0163 · vd (Art. 13 al. 2 LPA-VD)
Complainant Denied Party Status and File Access in Professional Disciplinary Proceedings
This provision establishes that the denouncer does not have standing as a party in the administrative procedure, which supports the decision to deny the appellant party status.
FO.2021.0018 · vd (art. 13 LPA-VD)
Tenant Farmer's Right to be Heard in Land Subdivision Approval
This provision defining the circle of parties was cited in connection with the violation of the right to be heard, justifying the annulment of the decisions.
AC.2020.0148 · vd (art. 13 LPA-VD)
Tenants' Challenge to Exemption of Rental Villas from Housing Stock Preservation Law
Cited as the basis for the violation of the right to be heard concerning the quality of the parties in the prior administrative procedure.
AC.2020.0289 · vd (art. 13 LPA-VD)
Appeal Concerning Administrative Order to Cease Unpermitted Site Storage and Restoration
Used to confirm the standing (qualité de partie) of the opposing parties in the administrative procedure below.
GE.2020.0160 · vd (art. 13 al. 1 let. a LPA-VD)
Architect Disciplinary Warning Upheld Over Conflict of Interest in Payment Supervision
Cited in the context of discussing the complainant's (dénonciateur) standing to appeal, though ultimately found not to grant them party status in the appeal procedure.
GE.2020.0160 · vd (art. 13 al. 2 LPA-VD)
Architect Disciplinary Warning Upheld Over Conflict of Interest in Payment Supervision
Cited in relation to the complainant's lack of party status, as it generally excludes the denouncer from party status unless specifically provided otherwise.
GE.2016.0051 · vd (Art. 13 al. 1 let. a LPA-VD)
Co-Owner Challenge to Traffic Prohibition on Local Road Upheld
Although discussed extensively, this provision regarding standing was used to admit the appeal against charges imposed on the property, justifying the court's ability to hear the case.
AC.2014.0415 · vd (art. 13 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Building Permit Refusal for Extensive Renovation Deemed New Construction
Mentioned in relation to the procedural requirement that provisional opinions should hear all parties.
AI.231.15.86.206 · vd (Art. 13 LPA-VD)
Employer Compensation Claim for Retroactive Disability Benefits Against Insured's Rights
Cited in the reasoning regarding the definition of parties in administrative proceedings, justifying the intervention of X.____.
AC.2011.0273 · vd (Art. 13 al. 1 let. d LPA-VD)
Tenants' Appeal of Building Permit and LDTR Applicability
Used implicitly in the reasoning regarding the appellants' right to be heard (as parties to the preceding procedure).
GE.2009.0203 · vd (Art. 13 al. 1 let. a, c et d LPA-VD)
Neighbors v. Municipality Regarding Sunday Car Wash Operation
Cited to establish the protected interest of neighbors to participate in the procedure when operating hours are modified in a way that could aggravate disadvantages.
GE.2010.0185 · vd (Art. 13 al. 2 LPA-VD)
Bar Association Disciplinary Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Complainant Interest
This article was cited in the reasoning section to discuss the general principle regarding the status of a denouncer in cantonal administrative procedure.
AC.2010.0229 · vd (Art. 13 LPA-VD)
Discotheque Permit Refusal Upheld Due to Vested Rights Lapse and Public Inquiry Justification
Cited in the legal reasoning regarding who has party status in administrative proceedings, which is foundational to the public inquiry requirement.
GE.2009.0187 · vd (art. 13 LPA-VD (RSV 173.36))
Massage Parlor Operator v. Cantonal Commercial Police (Prostitution Register Compliance)
Cited as the legal basis allowing the appellant to contest the decision, as it affects her legal situation.
AI.90.09 · vd (Art. 13 LPA-VD)
Appeal Regarding Accident Insurer's Party Status in Disability Benefits Case
Cited in the text preceding the dispositive as defining the quality of parties, which determined the rejection of the intervention request in order I.