Art. 111 LOI sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD) - Compétence

PPD.2.23.40.2024 · vd (Art. 111 al. 1 LPA-VD)

Pension Asset Division in Divorce Settlement

Cited in the reasoning explaining the procedural basis for the single judge to rule based on the file given the parties' agreement.

PPD.2.22.12.2023 · vd (Art. 111 al. 1 LPA-VD)

Pension Asset Equalization Upon Divorce

Cited in the reasoning section regarding the judge's duty to rule based on the file when there are no disputes on the amount of vested benefits to be divided, and the provision listed at the beginning of the decision suggests relevance, though not explicitly in the final orders.

PPD.4.20.27.2022 · vd (Art. 111 al. 1 LPA-VD)

Pension Transfer Execution Impossibility and Judgment Revision

Although cited in the header section, the operative part of the decision relies on the substance of Art. 100 al. 1 let. b LPA-VD (mentioned in the reasoning) to justify the revision, but the actual revision (Order I) does not explicitly cite any specific article justifying the substantive modification itself, other than implicitly the power to revise based on facts justifying the change (which is reasoned using Art. 100 al. 1 let. b LPA-VD).

PPD.4.20.27.2022 · vd (art. 111 al. 1 LPA-VD)

Social Insurance Court Pension Division Following Divorce Decree

The court cited this provision to justify deciding based on the file due to the parties' lack of contestation.

Jug.2022.244 · vd (Art. 111 al. 1 LPA-VD)

Pension Asset Division in Divorce Decree Execution

This procedural rule justified the single judge ruling based on the case file due to the parties not contesting the calculated amounts.

Jug.2022.81 · vd (art. 111 al. 1 LPA-VD)

Pension Asset Division After Divorce

Cited to support the decision to rule based on the file when the parties do not contest the amount of the withdrawal benefits to be shared.

Jug.2021.308 · vd (Art. 111 al. 1 LPA-VD)

Pension Asset Equalization in Divorce Proceedings

Cited at the beginning as general law, but not in the dispositive.

Jug.2021.308 · vd (Art. 111 al. 1 LPA-VD)

Pension Asset Equalization in Divorce Proceedings

Cited in the reasoning (point 1) to justify the judge's decision based on the case file due to lack of contestation, but not explicitly in the final dispositive orders (I and II).

Jug.2021.87 · vd (art. 111 al. 2 LPA-VD)

Division of Professional Pension Assets in Divorce

Cited as establishing the applicable analogy for the composition of the Court (three magistrates).

Arr.t.2020.343 · vd (art. 111 al. 1 LPA-VD)

Occupational Benefit Equalization Following Divorce

Cited to establish the procedural rule for the single judge to rule based on the file in the absence of party contestation.

Arr.t.2019.647 · vd (art. 111 al. 1 LPA-VD)

Swiss Occupational Benefit Division Following Divorce

Cited in the reasoning section to justify the single judge ruling based on the case file when parties do not dispute the amounts.

Jug.2017.141 · vd (art. 111 al. 1 LPA-VD)

Pension Asset Division Post-Divorce Decree

Procedural rule applied by the single judge to rule on the case based on the file in the absence of contestation.

Jug.2017.2 · vd (art. 111 al. 1 LPA-VD)

Pension Benefit Division Calculation in Divorce

Cited in the reasoning section to justify the single judge ruling based on the file in the absence of party contestation.

Jug.2016.45 · vd (art. 111 al. 2 LPA-VD)

Pension Division Following Lump-Sum Withdrawal

Applied to shift the procedure from simplified to ordinary due to contestation raised by one party.

Jug.2016.20 · vd (art. 111 al. 1 LPA-VD)

Occupational Benefit Division After Divorce

Cited in the reasoning for the competence of the single judge in the absence of contestation (though not explicitly in the final orders I, II, III).