173.32
LJGLJC
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 9 LOI sur la juridiction constitutionnelle (LJC) - Contre des actes cantonaux
Titre II, Chapitre II
Art. 9 LJC · Contre des actes cantonaux
1. A la qualité pour agir contre une règle de droit cantonal, toute personne physique ou morale qui a un intérêt digne de protection à ce que l'acte attaqué soit annulé.
2. Ont également qualité pour former une requête
a. le Conseil d'Etat;
b. un dixième des membres du Grand Conseil;
c. une ou plusieurs communes pour violation de leur autonomie.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (16)
CCST.2020.0006 · vd (art. 9 al. 1 LJC)
Challenge to Religious Gathering Restriction Mooted by Repeal
Cited in the reasoning to establish the requérants' standing to sue (qualité pour agir).
CCST.2014.0003 · vd (art. 9 al. 1 LJC)
Cantonal Restriction on Physician Employment Contracts Upheld Against Federal Law Challenge
Cited in the reasoning to establish the standing of parties to challenge a cantonal rule of law.
CCST.2013.0002 · vd (art. 9 al. 2 LJC)
Councilors' Appeal Against Begging Ban Regulation Suspension Lifted
The court noted that the requesters were acting under this provision concerning their standing regarding the contested norm.
CCST.2012.0003 · vd (Art. 9 al. 1 LJC)
Nursing Home Tariff Challenge Rejected on Procedural Grounds
Cited to confirm that the applicants had standing (interest worthy of protection) to challenge the legal rule.
CCST.2011.0008 · vd (art. 9 al. 2 let. a LJC)
Challenge to Regional Fire and Rescue Association Statutes Upheld
This provision was cited in the reasoning regarding the standing of a municipality challenging a cantonal act based on municipal autonomy.
CCST.2011.0008 · vd (art. 9 al. 2 let. c LJC)
Challenge to Regional Fire and Rescue Association Statutes Upheld
This provision was cited in the reasoning concerning municipal autonomy, where the Court examines whether the municipality has grounds to invoke autonomy.
CCST.2011.0008 · vd (art. 9 al. 2 let. c LJC)
Challenge to Regional Fire and Rescue Association Statutes Upheld
This provision was cited in the reasoning discussing municipal autonomy and standing.
CCST.2011.0008 · vd (art. 9 al. 2 let. c LJC)
Challenge to Regional Fire and Rescue Association Statutes Upheld
This provision was mentioned in the reasoning concerning the principle of municipal autonomy, regarding the standing of a municipality challenging a cantonal act.
CCST.2008.0012 · vd (Art. 9 al. 1 LJC)
Federation of Private Elderly Care Facilities v. Cantonal Executive Order on Public Interest Recognition
Cited in reasoning (point 1.d) to define who has the standing to challenge the regulation.
CCST.2008.0002 · vd (Art. 9 al. 2 let. a LJC)
State Executive v. Canton on Deportation Suspension
This article was cited in the reasoning confirming the admissibility of the State Council's request, although it is not strictly a procedural rule applied in the final *operative* orders (which only annulled the LVLEtr article and addressed costs).
CCST.2007.0004 · vd (art. 9 al. 1 LJC)
Engineers Challenge Cantonal Law on Mandatory Geological Data Transmission
Cited in the reasoning section (point 1c) to explain the requirement for active legitimacy, which the court confirmed the applicants met before issuing the final rejection.
CCST.2008.0001 · vd (art. 9 al. 1 LJC)
Challenge to Cantonal Law on Arrest of Foreigners Dismissed for Lack of Standing
Cited in the reasoning to define who has standing to challenge a cantonal rule, which is the basis for declaring the requests inadmissible.
CCST.2006.0010 · vd (art. 9 al. 2 let. c LJC)
Municipal Challenge to Electricity Distribution Monopoly Regulations
Cited in the reasoning (point 1) to confirm the standing of the communes to appeal based on violation of their autonomy.
CCST.2006.0003 · vd (Art. 9 al. 1 LJC)
Challenge to 2006 Medico-Social Establishment Socio-Hotel Daily Rate Decree Upheld
Implicitly applied as the court ruled on the receivability of the appeals before rejecting them on the merits.
CCST.2006.0002 · vd (Art. 9 al. 2 let. b LJC)
Challenge to Provisional Criteria for Inter-Communal Financial Equalization
Cited to confirm the capacity to sue for the deputies included in the second application (Claudine Amstein and others).