173.32
LJGLJC
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 5 LOI sur la juridiction constitutionnelle (LJC) - Dispositions communes
Titre II, Chapitre I
Art. 5 LJC · Dispositions communes
1. Pour les actes cantonaux, la requête est déposée dans un délai de vingt jours à compter de la publication officielle de l'acte attaqué.
2. Pour les règlements communaux et intercommunaux, soumis à l'approbation cantonale, la requête est déposée dans un délai de vingt jours à compter de la publication officielle de cette approbation ou du refus d'approbation.
3. Pour les règlements communaux et intercommunaux non soumis à l'approbation cantonale, la requête est déposée dans un délai de vingt jours à compter de l'affichage au pilier public.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (13)
CCST.2018.0006 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 LJC)
Municipal Parking Fee Modification Overruled Due to Tax Component
Used to confirm that the request was submitted within the required time limit.
CCST.2015.0002 · vd (art. 5 al. 2 LJC)
Ride-Sharing Platform v. Intercommunal Taxi Service Regulation (Call Center Requirements)
Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the appeal was filed within the twenty-day period for reviewing intercommunal regulations.
CCST.2015.0003 · vd (art. 5 al. 2 LJC)
Taxi Operators Challenge Intercommunal Service Regulation Amendments
Cited in the reasoning (which is heavily cited) regarding the timeliness of the appeal but is not explicitly repeated in the final orders (Dispositif I, II, III).
CCST.2014.0003 · vd (art. 5 al. 1 LJC)
Cantonal Restriction on Physician Employment Contracts Upheld Against Federal Law Challenge
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the timeliness of the appeal submission.
CCST.2012.0003 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 LJC)
Nursing Home Tariff Challenge Rejected on Procedural Grounds
Cited in the context of determining that the appeal was filed within the deadline.
CCST.2011.0006 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 LJC)
Cantonal Decree on Hemp Cultivation Timeliness Challenge
Cited in the reasoning as establishing that the twenty-day deadline for filing the appeal starts from the official publication of the challenged act, which is the basis for the final decision of inadmissibility.
CCST.2011.0004 · vd (art. 5 al. 1 LJC)
Constitutional Challenge to Cantonal Education Law Admissibility Ruling
This procedural rule specifies the deadline (twenty days from official publication) for filing the petition, which was the basis for declaring the request inadmissible.
CCST.2011.0003 · vd (Art. 5 al. 2 LJC)
Property Owners Challenge Retroactive Wastewater Fee Application
Implied in the admissibility finding, as the deadline for filing the appeal based on official publication was respected under this article, although the article itself is not explicitly cited in the final orders.
CCST.2008.0012 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 LJC)
Federation of Private Elderly Care Facilities v. Cantonal Executive Order on Public Interest Recognition
Cited in reasoning (point 1.b) to confirm that the appeal was timely filed within the 20-day limit.
CCST.2007.0004 · vd (art. 5 al. 1 LJC)
Engineers Challenge Cantonal Law on Mandatory Geological Data Transmission
Cited in the reasoning section (point 1b) to confirm that the appeal was filed within the statutory time limit, supporting the admissibility leading to the final rejection.
CCST.2007.0003 · vd (Art. 5 al. 2 LJC)
Taxi Operator Challenge to Municipal Taxi Regulations
Defines the deadline for challenging communal regulations subject to cantonal approval.
CCST.2006.0003 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 LJC)
Challenge to 2006 Medico-Social Establishment Socio-Hotel Daily Rate Decree Upheld
Cited in the context of declaring the first request premature based on the start of the appeal deadline.
CCST.2006.0002 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1er LJC)
Challenge to Provisional Criteria for Inter-Communal Financial Equalization
Cited as the basis for determining that the appeals were submitted within the twenty-day deadline (admissibility in form).