173.32 LJGLJC

CH-VD

Art. 3 LOI sur la juridiction constitutionnelle (LJC) - Actes soumis

Titre II, Chapitre I

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (25 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 3 LJC · Actes soumis

1. La Cour contrôle, sur requête, la conformité au droit supérieur des actes adoptés par des autorités cantonales contenant des règles de droit.

2. Peuvent faire l'objet d'un tel contrôle, s'ils remplissent ces conditions

a. les lois et les décrets du Grand Conseil;

b. les règlements du Conseil d'Etat;

c. les directives publiées d'un département ou d'un service.

3. Peuvent également faire l'objet d'un tel contrôle tous les règlements, arrêtés ou tarifs communaux et intercommunaux, contenant des règles de droit, de même que le refus d'approbation de tels actes par le Canton, lorsque celle-ci est requise.

← Art. 2 LJC sur la juridiction constitutionnelle (LJC) - Objet Art. 4 LJC →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (20)

CCST.2018.0006 · vd (Art. 3 al. 3 LJC)

Municipal Parking Fee Modification Overruled Due to Tax Component

Used to confirm that the scope of review extends to communal regulations containing rules of law.

CCST.2017.0014 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 LJC)

Commercial Entities Challenge Cantonal Regulation on Subsidies for Medico-Social Establishments

Used to reject the request because the challenged regulation (RCIEMMS) was not contrary to superior law.

CCST.2017.0002 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 LJC)

Taxpayer Challenge to Municipal Water Taxes Upheld on Procedural Grounds.

Used to reject the appeal because the contested norms were not contrary to higher law.

CCST.2014.0003 · vd (art. 3 al. 2 let. a LJC)

Cantonal Restriction on Physician Employment Contracts Upheld Against Federal Law Challenge

Cited in the reasoning to confirm that cantonal laws are subject to constitutional review.

CCST.2013.0006 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 LJC)

Medical-Social Institutions v. State Council Tariff Decree

Used to reject the application because the contested norms of the socio-hotel tariff decree were not contrary to superior law.

CCST.2013.0009 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 LJC)

Tariff Challenge Against Medico-Social Establishments Confirmed

This provision was used as the legal basis for rejecting the appeal because the contested norms of the 2012 socio-hotel ordinance were not contrary to superior law.

CCST.2013.0002 · vd (art. 3 al. 3 LJC)

Councilors' Appeal Against Begging Ban Regulation Suspension Lifted

This article was cited to establish the Court's jurisdiction in abstract review of communal norms, which is the context of the main appeal.

CCST.2012.0003 · vd (Art. 3 al. 1 LJC)

Nursing Home Tariff Challenge Rejected on Procedural Grounds

This provision defines the Court's jurisdiction to review the conformity of cantonal acts containing legal rules, which was the basis for examining the request against the Decree.

CCST.2012.0003 · vd (Art. 3 al. 2 let. b LJC)

Nursing Home Tariff Challenge Rejected on Procedural Grounds

Cited to confirm that Council of State regulations (like the contested Decree) are subject to review.

CCST.2011.0008 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 et 3 LJC)

Challenge to Regional Fire and Rescue Association Statutes Upheld

This provision defines the scope of review, confirming that the statutes constitute a normative act applicable to the Court's review.

CCST.2008.0012 · vd (Art. 3 al. 2 let. b LJC)

Federation of Private Elderly Care Facilities v. Cantonal Executive Order on Public Interest Recognition

Cited in reasoning (point 1.a) to confirm that State Council regulations are subject to review by the Constitutional Court.

CCST.2008.0010 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 let. c LJC)

Inadmissibility of Challenge to Penitentiary Directive on Inmate Computer Use

The request was declared inadmissible because the challenged directive did not meet the criteria for abstract review under this provision (specifically, lack of publication and possibility of concrete review).

CCST.2008.0002 · vd (Art. 3 al. 1 LJC)

State Executive v. Canton on Deportation Suspension

This article was cited in the reasoning confirming the admissibility of the State Council's request, although it is not strictly a procedural rule applied in the final *operative* orders (which only annulled the LVLEtr article and addressed costs).

CCST.2008.0002 · vd (Art. 3 al. 2 let. a LJC)

State Executive v. Canton on Deportation Suspension

This article was cited in the reasoning confirming the admissibility of the State Council's request, although it is not strictly a procedural rule applied in the final *operative* orders (which only annulled the LVLEtr article and addressed costs).

PS.2007.0212 · vd (Art. 3 al. 2 LJC)

Asylum Seeker Residency Permit Holder Challenges Increase in Accommodation Allowance Rate

Mentioned in the reasoning concerning the possibility of abstract review of the standard, related to the scope of constitutional review.