Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
173.32 LJGLJC CH-VD

Art. 13 LOI sur la juridiction constitutionnelle (LJC) - Pouvoir d'examen

Titre II, Chapitre III
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (25 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 13 LJC · Pouvoir d'examen

1. La Cour limite son examen aux griefs invoqués par le requérant, sauf s'il apparaît que l'acte attaqué est manifestement contraire au droit de rang supérieur.

← Art. 12 LJC sur la juridiction constitutionnelle (LJC) - Objet Art. 14 LJC →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (16)

D-2975/2021 (Art. 13.3 VGG)
Asylum seeker's Sri Lanka deportation upheld despite new evidence.
Lehnt die Gesuche um unentgeltliche Prozessführung und unentgeltliche Rechtsbeiständin ab.
VD.2019.243 · bs (§ 13 i.V.m. § 11 Abs. 1 lit. b der Verordnung zum Gesetz über die Verwaltungsgebühren (VGG, SG 153.810))
Family Reunification Appeal Based on Important Family Reasons Despite Late Applications
Basis for determining the amount of the party compensation awarded for the prior administrative appeal proceedings.
VD.2014.258 · bs (§ 13 Abs. 1 VGG)
Cost Allocation in Administrative Appeal Over Precautionary License Withdrawal
Cited in the context of the maximum level for party compensation awarded for the administrative appeal proceedings.
PVG 2006 28 · gr (Art. 13 Abs. 1 lit. a VGG)
Municipality Water Protection Structure Compliance with Environmental Law
Applied to confirm the jurisdiction of the administrative court to rule on the appeal.
U 2006 29 · gr (Art. 13 Abs. 1 lit. a VGG)
Teacher Dismissal Void Due to Sick Leave During Notice Period
Cited in the reasoning as establishing the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court over the final communal decision, which is relevant to the court's competence to hear the appeal.
R 2006 6 · gr (Art. 13 Abs. 1 lit. b VGG)
Forest Delineation Revision Timeliness
Cited in the reasoning to define the object of appeal as a decision not to enter a review by a cantonal department.
R 2006 6 · gr (Art. 13 Abs. 1 lit. b VGG)
Forest Delineation Revision Timeliness Appeal
Cited in Erwägung 1 as the basis for classifying the appealed decision (the refusal to proceed) as subject to administrative court review.
V 2006 1 · gr (Art. 13 Abs. 1 lit. f VGG)
Voter Challenge to Municipal Ordinance Election Dismissed Due to Scope Limitation
This prior provision is mentioned to confirm that the jurisdiction of the court concerning political rights was established previously, informing the current application of Art. 55 Abs. 2 Ziff. 1 KV.
V 2005 3 · gr (Art. 13 Abs. 1 lit. f VGG)
Challenge to Municipal Land Sale Notice Period
This provision determines the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court to rule on the appeal concerning the municipal vote.
V 2005 3 · gr (Art. 13 Abs. 1 lit. f VGG)
Appeal Concerning Validity of Municipal Assembly Proceedings and Land Sale Approval
This provision defines the administrative court's jurisdiction to rule on the appeal concerning the municipal vote.
V 2005 1 · gr (Art. 13 Abs. 1 lit. a VGG)
Challengers Lack Standing to Appeal Zoning Plan Amendment
Cited in reasoning to establish that zoning plans (Quartierpläne) are administrative decisions subject to appeal (Rekurs) under cantonal law, contrasting with the inadmissibility of the constitutional appeal.
U 2004 90 · gr (Art. 13 Abs. 1 lit. c des Verwaltungsgerichtsgesetzes (VGG, BR 370.100))
Hemp Seizure Upheld Due to Insufficient Legal Use Proof and Security Measures
This procedural article established the court's jurisdiction to review the decision, including the destruction order.
U 2004 20 · gr (Art. 13 VGG)
Municipal Executive Recusal Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Appealable Administrative Act
Cited in the reasoning section (Erwägung 1) regarding the conditions for an appeal to the Administrative Court, which is relevant context but the core decision is based on the lack of an appealable decision.
PVG 2003 1 · gr (Art. 13 Abs. 1 lit. c VGG)
Journalist Entry Ban Review and Article 6 ECHR Scope
Cited in the conclusion in conjunction with Art. 6 EMRK to affirm that final judicial review by a cantonal court was not required.
PVG 2002 3 · gr (Art. 13 VGG)
Jurisdiction over Private Law Employment Disputes Involving Publicly Owned Entities
The termination is not a contestable administrative act in the sense of this article because no public service relationship exists.