173.31.1
ROTC
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 33 RÈGLEMENT organique du Tribunal cantonal (ROTC) - Composition de la cour
Chapitre I, Section IV
Art. 33 ROTC · Composition de la cour
1. La Cour de droit administratif et public siège à trois juges
a. lorsqu'elle statue sur un recours incident ;
b. lorsqu'elle est appelée à trancher essentiellement des questions juridiques complexes.
2. Elle statue à deux juges et un assesseur ou un juge et deux assesseurs dans les autres cas. Le choix entre ces deux types de composition tient compte des critères suivants
a. nécessité de connaissances techniques spécifiques ;
b. degré de complexité des questions juridiques à résoudre.
3. Les juges appelés à statuer en sus du juge instructeur sont désignés à tour de rôle.
4. Les assesseurs ayant la même spécialité sont désignés à tour de rôle, sous réserve de leur disponibilité.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (9)
RE.2017.0013 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 let. a du règlement organique du Tribunal cantonal du 13 novembre 2007 (ROTC; RSV 173.31.1))
Appeal Concerning Boundary Correction Access and Suspensive Effect
Cited in the reasoning to establish the composition of the Court (3 judges), but not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive orders.
PE.2015.0167 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 let. b du règlement organique du Tribunal cantonal, du 13 novembre 2007 (ROTC; RSV 173.31.1))
Appellant v. Population Service (Entry Authorization Refusal)
Cited by the judge in the reasoning section as a rule allowing the judge to submit the case to the full Court.
PE.2013.0482 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 let. b du règlement organique du Tribunal cantonal, du 13 novembre 2007 (ROTC; RSV 173.31.1))
Appeal of Population Service Visa Extension Refusal Mooted by Departure
This provision, cited in the reasoning regarding the judge's power to refer the case to the full court, is not explicitly used in the dispositive orders.
AC.2012.0166 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 let. b du règlement organique du Tribunal cantonal, du 13 novembre 2007 – ROTC, RSV 173.31.1)
Property Owner Appeal Moot Due to Subsequent Rezoning
Cited as the procedural basis allowing the judge rapporteur to submit the case to the full court due to complexity.
PE.2011.0285 · vd (art. 33 ROTC)
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Unsigned Submission and Missed Fee Payment
This provision dictated that the Administrative and Public Law Court must rule in its ordinary composition due to doubts regarding the single judge's authority.
BO.2010.0030 · vd (Art. 33 al. 1 let. b ROTC)
Student Grant Repayment Following Exmatriculation Despite Later Appeal Overturn
Cited in the reasoning regarding the composition of the bench but not in the final operative orders (I-IV).
CP.2007.0012 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 lit. a ROTC)
Revision of Unemployment Benefit Denial Based on Subsequent Case Law
This provision was used to determine that the case should be decided by a panel of three judges.
RE.2008.0019 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 let. a ROTC)
Day-Care Suspension Appeal Granted Suspensive Effect
Cited in the reasoning regarding the panel composition for deciding the appeal, but not explicitly used in the final orders (orders I-V).
RE.2008.0013 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 let. a ROTC)
Restaurant Terrace Capacity Dispute and Stay of Execution Appeal
Cited to establish that the Administrative and Public Law Court section (three judges) rules on decisions regarding the suspensive effect during the incidental appeal procedure.