173.01
LOJV
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 83c LOI d'organisation judiciaire (LOJV) - kb) Composition [ 27 ]
Titre II, Chapitre I
Art. 83c LOJV · kb) Composition [ 27 ]
1. Lorsqu'elle statue, la Cour des assurances sociales est composée de trois magistrats, dont au moins un juge du Tribunal cantonal.
2. L'article 94 de la loi sur la procédure administrative [S] est réservé.
3. Le mode de composition de la cour est arrêté par un règlement [T] .
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (22)
PPD.1.22.13.2023 · vd (art. 83c al. 1 LOJV)
Pension Benefit Division Following Swiss Divorce
Cited in the reasoning to determine the composition of the court due to the value in dispute.
AI.246.16.ap.TF.74.2018 · vd (art. 83c al. 1 LOJV)
Insured's Appeal Against Retroactive Benefit Compensation Reimbursed to Pension Foundation Denied
Cited in the reasoning section as a reference for justifying the composition of the panel of three magistrates.
AA.114.13.89.2015 · vd (art. 83c al. 1 LOJV)
Insurance Coverage Denial for Death During Hike
Cited to justify the composition of the Court based on the value in dispute.
Jug.2015.162 · vd (art. 83c al. 1 LOJV)
Insured Person v. Pension Funds Regarding Sequential Disabilities
Cited in the reasoning to justify the composition of the court (three magistrates).
Jug.2014.97 · vd (art. 83c al. 1 LOJV)
Pension Fund Liability for Pre-Insurance Disability Onset
Cited in the reasoning regarding the composition of the court (3 magistrates instead of a single judge), although the decision on composition is not an explicit order.
AI.75.11.33.2014 · vd (Art. 83c LOJV)
Work Accident Disability Appeal Denial Upheld
Cited in the reasoning for determining the panel size due to the value in dispute.
AI.110.13.157.2013 · vd (Art. 83c al. 1 LOJV)
Insured Person v. Administrative Office (Informant Identity Disclosure)
This article was cited to specify the composition of the panel (three magistrates) required for the court to rule on declining jurisdiction.
AI.215.10.451.2011 · vd (art. 83c al. 1 LOJV)
Disability Benefits Calculation Appeal Based on Historical Earnings
Cited to determine that the case must be decided by a bench of three magistrates because the litigation value exceeds CHF 30,000.
AI.209.09.394.2011 · vd (art. 83c al. 1 LOJV)
Disability Benefits Cessation Appeal Regarding Severe Depression and Somatoform Pain Disorder
Cited in the reasoning regarding the required composition of the court (three magistrates).
Arr.t.2011.842 · vd (Art. 83c al. 1 LOJV)
Former Trustee v. Pension Foundation Regarding Withheld Benefits
Applied to determine that the case must be decided by a panel of three magistrates because the amount in dispute exceeded CHF 30,000.
AI.327.08.373.2011 · vd (art. 83c al. 1 LOJV)
Mason v. Social Security Administration (Disability Benefits Appeal)
Cited to establish the composition of the court (three magistrates) in point 1b.
AI.137.11.et.AA.62.09.299.2011 · vd (Art. 83c al. 1 LOJV)
Insured vs. Accident and Disability Insurers: Residual Earning Capacity and Hypothetical Income Calculation
Cited in the reasoning to justify the composition of the court (three magistrates) because the value in dispute exceeded 30,000 francs.
AI.334.09.285.2011 · vd (art. 83c al. 1 LOJV)
Disability Benefits Denial Upheld with Remand for Post-Assessment Condition Review
Cited to determine the composition of the court (three magistrates) based on the value in dispute.
Jug.2011.47 · vd (Art. 83c al. 1 LOJV)
Insured Administrator Pension Calculation Dispute
Cited to establish that the case must be decided by a panel of three magistrates because the amount in dispute exceeded 30,000 Swiss francs.
AVS.15.09.41.2010 · vd (art. 83c al. 1 LOJV)
Recovery of Overpaid Supplementary Benefits Set Against Pension
Procedural rule determining that the case must be decided by a panel of three magistrates because the value in dispute exceeded 30,000 Swiss Francs.