173.01 LOJV

CH-VD

Art. 75 LOI d'organisation judiciaire (LOJV) - d) La Cour des poursuites et faillites [ 24, 29 ]

Titre II, Chapitre I

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (113 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 75 LOJV · d) La Cour des poursuites et faillites [ 24, 29 ]

1. La Cour des poursuites et faillites est l'autorité supérieure de surveillance, au sens de la loi fédérale, en matière de poursuites et de faillites [Q] ; elle prononce, en outre, sur les recours formés contre les prononcés rendus en procédure sommaire de poursuites et de faillites et dans la procédure de séquestre.

2. Elle statue également sur les appels et recours en matière d'exécution forcée et d'exequatur de créances pécunaires ou en constitution de sûretés.

← Art. 74 LOJV d'organisation judiciaire (LOJV) - Composition Art. 76 LOJV →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (6)

ML.2022.145 · vd (Art. 75 LOJV)

Inadmissibility of Intervention Against Enforcement Notification

Cited to establish the court's lack of authority to issue instructions to the lower judge outside of an appeal.

127----------- · vd (Art. 75 al. 1 LOJV)

Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Meet Argumentation Requirements in Unemployment Benefit Recovery Challenge

Cited to establish the Cantonal Court's jurisdiction as the appellate body over the lower court's decision.

302----------- · vd (Art. 75 LOJV)

Attorney Disqualification Appeal Regarding Conflict of Interest in Security Deposit Dispute

Cited to confirm the competence of the Cantonal Court (Cour des poursuites et faillites) to hear the appeal regarding decisions on the conduct of the proceedings, such as the capacity to practice.

ML.2020.242 · vd (art. 75 LOJV a contrario)

Brokerage Commission Provisional Lifting Appeal Decision

Cited in the reasoning for dismissing the action for debt release, as this article governs jurisdiction, but not explicitly in the final dispositive orders.

AM.22.14.34.2014 · vd (Art. 75 al. 1 LOJV)

Appeal Inadmissibility Regarding Payment Order Objection and Supplementary Insurance Jurisdiction

Cited in the reasoning regarding the competence of the Cour des poursuites et faillites, which underpins the decision to transmit the case.

HC.2011.229 · vd (Art. 75 LOJV)

Heirs v. Estate Insolvency: Right to Be Heard Violation

Cited in point 7 to clarify that the competence to annul the subsequent order of the Arrondissement Tribunal lies with the Canton Court's Enforcement and Bankruptcy Chamber.