141.11
LDCV
CH-VD
Art. 52 LOI sur le droit de cité vaudois (LDCV) - Préavis cantonal dans les procédures fédérales
Titre IV, Chapitre I
Art. 52 LDCV · Préavis cantonal dans les procédures fédérales
1. Le Service est l'autorité compétente pour donner le préavis prévu par le droit fédéral pour les procédures de naturalisations facilitées et de réintégration des étrangers.
2. Le Service peut renoncer à formuler un préavis.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (16)
GE.2016.0136 · vd (art. 52 al. 2 LDCV)
Refugee Naturalization Appeal: Insufficient Motivation and Right to be Heard Violated
Cited in the final orders as the legal basis for returning the case file to the municipal authority for a new decision following supplementary investigation.
GE.2016.0147 · vd (Art. 52 al. 1 LDCV)
Applicant's Naturalization Denial Upheld Due to Outstanding Debt
Cited in the reasoning to establish the basis for appealability, which is a prerequisite for the court to rule on the merits of the case.
GE.2014.0207 · vd (art. 52 al. 2 LDCV)
Applicants v. Municipality on Refusal of Communal Naturalization
Cited as the legal basis for returning the case to the municipal authority for a new decision after the annulment.
GE.2015.0022 · vd (Art. 52 al. 2 LDCV)
Appeal Regarding Naturalization Denial Based on Prior Conviction and Relocation
Used to annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the authority for a new decision.
GE.2012.0126 · vd (art. 52 al. 2 LDCV)
Municipality Citizenship Refusal Overturned Due to Lack of Motivation and Failure to Consider Health Status
Cited as the procedural basis for returning the case to the municipal authority for a new decision after a supplementary investigation.
GE.2007.0098 · vd (Art. 52 al. 2 LDCV)
Cantonal Citizenship Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Integration
Cited to specify the court's limited power of review (cassation only) regarding the substantive decision on the merits.
GE.2006.0053 · vd (art. 52 al. 2 LDCV)
Applicant v. Municipality (Citizenship Denial Based on Prior Conviction and Integration Assessment)
Cited because the appeal is of a purely cassatory nature against decisions made under the LDCV.
GE.2006.0051 · vd (Art. 52 al. 2 LDCV)
Minor's Appeal Against Refusal of Facilitated Naturalization Due to Juvenile Conviction and Unsubstantiated Misconduct Allegations
Cited as the basis for the exclusively cassatory nature of the appeal, leading to the annulment of the decision and referral back to the authority.
GE.2006.0127 · vd (art. 52 LDCV)
Appeal Against Rejection of Naturalization Due to Lack of Competence
Cited in the reasoning to establish the appealability to the Administrative Tribunal, not explicitly used in the final orders.
GE.2005.0166 · vd (art. 52 al. 2 LDCV)
Communal Citizenship Denial Based on Husband's Disruptive Conduct
The court noted its power was limited to cassation when admitting the appeal, as per this provision, confirming the refusal to award the bourgeois status directly.
GE.2006.0050 · vd (Art. 52 al. 1 LDCV)
Bosnian National Denied Naturalization Due to Insufficient Integration
Cited as the legal basis for the administrative court's jurisdiction to review municipal decisions regarding the granting of citizenship.
GE.2006.0050 · vd (Art. 52 al. 2 LDCV)
Bosnian National Denied Naturalization Due to Insufficient Integration
Cited as the legal consequence of admitting the appeal, although the appeal was rejected.
GE.2006.0038 · vd (art. 52 al. 2 LDCV)
Applicant v. Communal Council (Lack of Motivation in Citizenship Denial)
Cited in the dispositive (Order II) as the basis for sending the case back to the lower authority for a new decision after annulling the contested decision.
GE.2005.0232 · vd (Art. 52 LDCV)
Refugees Denied Citizenship Due to Insufficient French Proficiency
This provision establishes the right of appeal to the Administrative Tribunal against municipal decisions regarding citizenship.
GE.2005.0085 · vd (Art. 52 LDCV)
Applicant Denied Naturalization Due to Insufficient Integration and Poor Knowledge Test Scores
This article establishes the right to appeal to the Administrative Tribunal against decisions made under the LDCV.