101.01
KV-VDCST-VD
CH-VD
Art. 27 CONSTITUTION du Canton de Vaud (Cst-VD) - Garanties générales de procédure
Titre II
Art. 27 Cst-VD · Garanties générales de procédure
1. Toute personne a droit, dans une procédure judiciaire ou administrative, à ce que sa cause soit traitée équitablement et jugée dans un délai raisonnable.
2. Les parties ont, dans toute procédure, le droit d'être entendues, de consulter le dossier de leur cause et de recevoir une décision motivée avec indication des voies de recours.
3. Toute personne sans ressources suffisantes a droit à l'assistance judiciaire aux conditions fixées par la loi.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (35)
GE.2025.0014 · vd (art. 27 al. 2 Cst-VD)
Candidate v. Notary Traineeship Refusal Based on Missing ECTS Credits
Cited in the context of examining and rejecting the appellant's claim of violation of the right to be heard, showing it was relevant to the decision's legal grounds, although the core rejection rested on procedural findings regarding the evidence offered.
AC.2024.0188 · vd (Art. 27 al. 2 Cst-VD)
Municipal Order to Cease Unlicensed Residential Rental Upheld Against Property Owners
Cited as the cantonal constitutional basis for the right to be heard, the alleged violation of which was fully examined and ultimately found to be non-established or repaired.
PS.2024.0054 · vd (Art. 27 al. 2 Cst-VD)
Recipient's Refusal to Comply Justifies Termination of Social Assistance
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to be heard, which is guaranteed constitutionally.
AC.2023.0387 · vd (Art. 27 al. 2 Cst-VD)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit and Tree Removal
This constitutional provision is cited in the reasoning but not in the dispositive orders (I to IV).
GE.2023.0069 · vd (art. 27 al. 2 de la Constitution du Canton de Vaud du 14 avril 2003 (Cst-VD; BLV 101.01))
Calf-Fattening Operation Drug Storage and Hygiene Compliance Appeal
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to be heard, but not explicitly used in the dispositive orders (I-VI).
PS.2023.0046 · vd (art. 27 al. 2 de la Constitution du Canton de Vaud du 14 avril 2003 (Cst-VD; BLV 101.01))
Housing Allowance Denial for Young Adult Living with Parents Upheld
Cited in relation to the right to be heard, which was discussed in the context of denying the request for witness testimony.
PE.2023.0044 · vd (Art. 27 al. 2 Cst-VD)
Refusal of Residence Permit for Medical Treatment Upheld
Cited in the context of analyzing the appellant's right to be heard regarding evidence requests.
PE.2022.0150 · vd (art. 27 al. 2 Cst-VD)
Algerian National Residency Appeal After Divorce and Criminal History
Cited as a cantonal constitutional guarantee of the right to be heard.
AC.2022.0178 · vd (Art. 27 al. 2 Cst-VD)
Appeal Against Municipal Order to Cease Automotive Activities Due to Disproportionate Measure
Cited in the reasoning concerning the right to be heard, but not explicitly applied in the dispositive orders (I-IV).
AC.2021.0003 · vd (art. 27 al. 2 Cst-VD)
Land Use Reclassification Upheld Against Property Owner Challenge
The court examined whether the appellant's right to be heard was violated, although the violation was deemed cured.
AC.2021.0002 · vd (art. 27 al. 2 Cst-VD)
Zoning Reclassification Challenge Upheld Against Property Rights Claim
Cited in the reasoning (considerant 2) as a cantonal constitutional guarantee of the right to be heard, invoked by the appellant regarding missing documents.
PS.2022.0030 · vd (art. 27 al. 2 Cst-VD)
Social Assistance Recipient vs. Divestment of Inherited Funds
Cited as the cantonal constitutional basis for the right to be heard (though not explicitly in the final orders I-V).
BO.2021.0003 · vd (Art. 27 al. 2 Cst-VD)
Appellant v. Cantonal Study Grant Office: Recalculation and Repayment of Study Grant Due to Undeclared Income
Cited as a constitutional guarantee of the right to be heard, relevant to the procedural arguments raised.
PE.2021.0164 · vd (art. 27 al. 2 de la Constitution du 14 avril 2003 du Canton de Vaud (Cst-VD))
Expulsion of Illegal Resident with Criminal Record Upheld
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to be heard, although not explicitly used in the final disposal orders (except implicitly by not granting the request).
PS.2020.0097 · vd (art. 27 al. 2 Cst-VD)
Recipient v. Administrative Authority on Suspension of Child Support Advances
Cited in reasoning regarding the right to be heard, although the main ground for the decision rests on the correct application of LRAPA provisions concerning the suspension of advances.