730.500
CIAPIVöBCIMP
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 18 CIAP Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (CIAP)
CIAP
Art. 18 CIAP
1 Se il contratto non è stato ancora concluso, l’istanza di ricorso può annullare la decisione e decidere essa stessa nel merito oppure può rinviare la decisione, con o senza condizioni vincolanti, al committente.
2 Se il contratto è già stato concluso ed il ricorso è fondato, l’istanza di ricorso constata il carattere illegale della decisione.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (28)
52.2024.128 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Bidder Challenge to Waste Collection Contract Award Based on Successor Entity Registration
Applied to attribute the contract directly to the appellant without remitting the case back to the Municipality for a new decision.
52.2022.116 · ti (Art. 18 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Consortium Challenge to Rail-Tram Contract Award Over Specialist Reference and Bid Compliance
Cited as the procedural basis for annulling the contested decision and remitting the case file to the contracting authority for a new award decision.
52.2021.489 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Contract Award Overturned Due to Incorrect Price Calculation
The Tribunal awarded the contract directly to the appellant based on this provision.
52.2021.510 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Challenge to Contract Award Based on Arbitrary Reference Price Reduction
Used to directly award the contract to the appellant (RI 1) after annulling the original decision.
52.2020.207 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Bidder Challenge Regarding Municipal Waste Removal Contract Award
Used to directly award the contract to the appellant after annulling the original decision.
52.2018.218 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Appeal of Contract Award for Failure to Meet Professional Registration Requirement
Cited as the basis for assigning the contract to the appellant because its director meets the required professional registration.
52.2018.304 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Appeal Regarding Fire Detection Contract Award Due to Director's Professional Registration Status
Cited as the legal basis for directly awarding the contract to the appellant (RI 1) instead of remitting the matter.
52.2016.389 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Contractor Qualification Based on In-House Personnel in Procurement Appeal
Used by the court to directly award the contract to the appellant, the only remaining competitor, after annulling the original decision.
52.2012.134 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Appeal Against Municipal Waste Container Contract Award under CIAP
Used to justify the direct awarding of the contract to the appellant because the court had the necessary elements.
52.2011.190 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 2 CIAP)
Architectural Competition Mandate Award Overruled Due to Procedural Irregularities
Used to limit the ruling to declaring the challenged decision illicit, as the contract had already been concluded.
52.2007.332 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 2 CIAP)
Municipality Contract Award Illegality Due to Budget Violation
Cited as the legal basis restricting the court to only establishing the illegality of the contested administrative act since the contract had already been concluded.
52.2006.219 · ti (Art. 18 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Construction Consortium Exclusion from Tender Partially Overturned on Procedural Grounds
Cited in the reasoning related to the court's power to decide on the merits after annulling the exclusion (leading to order 1.2).
52.2002.283 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Consortium Challenge to Wastewater Contract Award Over Flawed Evaluation Criteria
Applied because the case was referred back to the awarding body for a new decision since the premises for a decision on the merits were lacking.
52.1998.90 · ti (art. 11, 12, 15, 16, 18 CIAP)
Land Consolidation Consortium Prequalification Ranking Appeal Dismissed
These articles relate to the public procurement law governing the selection criteria and the review of the administrative body's discretionary power, forming the substantive basis for rejecting the appeals regarding the selection process.
52.2002.283 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Cantonal Tribunal Annuls Water Plant Contract Award Over Ex Post Facto Evaluation Methodology
Cited in the final order to justify returning the case file for a new decision.