730.500 CIAPIVöBCIMP

CH-TI

Art. 17 CIAP Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (CIAP)

CIAP

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (24 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 17 CIAP

1 Il ricorso non ha effetto sospensivo.

2 L’istanza di ricorso può, su richiesta o d’ufficio, accordare l’effetto sospensivo qualora il ricorso appaia sufficientemente motivato e non vi si oppongano interessi prevalenti, siano essi pubblici o privati.

3 Se l’effetto sospensivo viene accordato su richiesta del ricorrente e se ciò può causare un notevole pregiudizio, il ricorrente può, entro un termine ragionevole, essere obbligato a prestare garanzie per le spese processuali e per eventuali ripetibili. Se la garanzia non viene prestata in termine utile, la decisione sull’effetto sospensivo decade.

4 Il ricorrente è tenuto a risarcire il danno derivante dalla concessione dell’effetto sospensivo, se ha agito intenzionalmente o con grave negligenza.

← Art. 16 CIAP Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (CIAP) Art. 18 CIAP →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (9)

52.2007.332 · ti (art. 17 cpv. 1 CIAP)

Municipality Contract Award Illegality Due to Budget Violation

Cited to establish that appeals against decisions of the contracting authority do not have suspensive effect.

52.2006.129 · ti (art. 17 CIAP)

Bid Exclusion Appeals in Public Tender for Construction Management Services

Cited in the final enumeration of applicable legal provisions.

52.2002.78 · ti (art. 17 CIAP)

Appeal Against Award of Heavy Traffic Control Contract Following Allegedly Predatory Bid

Cited in the final considerations as a basis for the decision regarding the non-suspensive effect of appeals in public procurement.

52.1997.222 · ti (art. 1,4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, 15, 16, 17 CIAP)

Cantonal Hospital Demolition Bid Award Affirmed Despite Low-Bid Challenge

These articles of the CIAP form the substantive basis for the court's decision to reject the appeal regarding the awarding procedure, even though the appeal against the LApp provision was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.

52.2001.248 · ti (art. 17 CIAP)

Surveying Tender Annulled Due to Unlawful Lowest-Price Award Criterion

Cited in the final orders' block citation defining the applicable law, although its specific role is not detailed individually in the dispositive orders 1-4.

52.2001.427 · ti (art. 17 CIAP)

Bid Exclusion Upheld Due to Late Sample Submission and Lack of Standing.

Cited in the final list of provisions applied in the decision.

52.2001.69 · ti (art. 17 CIAP)

Bid Challenge Regarding Subsequent Award of Public Painting Works

Cited in the final orders as part of the general legal basis.

52.2002.78 · ti (art. 17 CIAP)

Public Procurement Challenge: Auxiliary Police Agents Contract Award and Below-Cost Bidding under CIAP

Cited concerning the legal rule that appeals in public procurement matters generally lack suspensive effect, although it was not decisive for the outcome.

52.2004.375 · ti (art. 17 CIAP)

Consortium Challenge to Electro-Mechanical System Design Award Based on Fee Offer Formalities

Cited in the final orders regarding the general application of the Intercantonal Agreement on Public Procurement (CIAP), concerning suspensive effect requests which were ultimately superseded.