730.500
CIAPIVöBCIMP
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 16 CIAP Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (CIAP)
CIAP
Art. 16 CIAP
1 Il ricorso è proponibile contro
a) le violazioni di diritto, compreso l’abuso e l’eccesso del potere di apprezzamento;
b) l’accertamento errato o incompleto di fatti giuridicamente rilevanti.
2 Non può essere addotto il motivo dell’inadeguatezza.
3 In mancanza di disposizioni d’esecuzione cantonali, possono essere fatte valere direttamente le disposizioni del presente Concordato.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (68)
52.2025.119 · ti (art. 16 cpv. 1 lett. a CIAP)
Child Transportation Tender Annulled for Sub-Criteria Weighting Omission
The reasoning found that the tender notice violated the principles of public procurement law by not sufficiently specifying the evaluation criteria, which relates to the abuse of discretionary power under this provision.
52.2024.120 · ti (art. 16 cpv. 1 lett. a CIAP)
Administrative Court Annuls Construction Contract Award Based on Invalid Reference Project Score
Although mentioned in the reasoning section 3.4 regarding the review of the margin of discretion, it is not cited in the dispositive orders.
52.2023.435 · ti (art. 16 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Bid Challenge Regarding Low Solid Waste Contract Price Upheld
Cited in the reasoning (considerand 3.3) to support the court's finding that the Municipality acted within its discretion, but not cited in the final orders.
52.2021.501 · ti (art. 16 cpv. 1 lett. a CIAP)
Ambulance Tender Exclusion Upheld Due to Missing Mandatory Documentation
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the review of the contracting authority's discretionary margin regarding references.
52.2019.310 · ti (art. 16 cpv. 2 RLCPubb/CIAP)
Security Contract Award Annulled Due to Unlawful Specification Restrictions
The violation of this provision regarding the prohibition of specifying a determined brand/type without 'or equivalent' was the core reason for annulling the decision (though not explicitly mentioned in the final orders, it is the ground for the partial acceptance in order 1, which leads to the cost orders).
52.2019.310 · ti (art. 16 cpv. 4 RLCPubb/CIAP)
Security Contract Award Annulled Due to Unlawful Specification Restrictions
Cited in the reasoning regarding exceptions to the prohibition on specifying brands (though not explicitly mentioned in the final orders, it is the ground for the partial acceptance in order 1, which leads to the cost orders).
52.2018.218 · ti (art. 16 CIAP)
Appeal of Contract Award for Failure to Meet Professional Registration Requirement
Cited implicitly as the basis for annulling the decision due to violation of the law concerning the required qualification criteria.
52.2018.342 · ti (art. 16 cpv. 1 lett. a CIAP)
Appeal Against Intermodal Station Metal Construction Contract Award Due to Technical Non-Compliance
Ground for partially accepting the appeal and annulling the State Council's decision because the awarded offer did not comply with mandatory tender specifications (the binding assembly sequence).
52.2018.304 · ti (art. 16 cpv. 1 lett. a CIAP)
Appeal Regarding Fire Detection Contract Award Due to Director's Professional Registration Status
Cited as the basis for accepting the appeal because the contested decision violated the law.
52.2016.399 · ti (art. 16 CIAP)
Consortium Appeal of Artificial Port Foundation Contract Award
The decision of the commissioning authority was annulled based on this article, as the awarded party failed to meet the eligibility criteria.
52.2015.148 · ti (art. 16 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Bid Challenge on Predatory Pricing in Public Tender Supply Contract
Used to confirm the contested decision as not violating the law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
52.2014.199 · ti (art. 16 cpv. 1 lett. a CIAP)
Challenge to Municipal Waste Collection Tender Over Disposal Site Change
Cited in the reasoning (considerand 2 and 5.2) to define the scope of judicial review regarding the awarding authority's discretionary power (abuse of discretion).
52.2014.199 · ti (art. 16 cpv. 2 CIAP)
Challenge to Municipal Waste Collection Tender Over Disposal Site Change
Cited in the reasoning (considerand 5.2) to state that the review of expediency (opportunità) in awarding decisions is excluded.
52.2012.75 · ti (art. 16 cpv. 2 RLCPubb/CIAP)
Public Tender Compatibility Challenge Over Software Specification
The main ground for annulling the tender documents was the violation of this provision which prohibits specifying products of a certain make unless absolutely necessary.
52.2010.133 · ti (art. 16 CIAP)
Bid Exclusion Upheld in Tunnel Electrical Tender Dispute
Cited in the preamble; referenced in consideration 4.4 regarding judicial review of procurement decisions.