Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
730.500 CIAPIVöBCIMP CH-TI

Art. 13 CIAP Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (CIAP)

CIAP
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (24 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 13 CIAP

Le disposizioni cantonali d’esecuzione garantiscono

a) le necessarie pubblicazioni, nonché la pubblicazione dei valori soglia;

b) il riferimento a specifiche tecniche non discriminatorie;

c) la fissazione di congrui termini per la presentazione delle offerte;

d) una procedura di verifica dell’idoneità degli offerenti secondo criteri oggettivi e verificabili;

e) il reciproco riconoscimento della qualifica degli offerenti iscritti in liste permanenti dei Cantoni concordatari;

f) adeguati criteri di aggiudicazione che garantiscano l’aggiudicazione all’offerta economicamente più vantaggiosa;

g) l’aggiudicazione mediante decisione;

h) la notifica dell’aggiudicazione corredata da una breve motivazione;

i) la limitazione dell’interruzione e della ripetizione della procedura di aggiudicazione per gravi motivi;

j) l’archiviazione.

← Art. 12bis CIAP Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (CIAP) Art. 14 CIAP →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (49)

52.2025.119 · ti (art. 13 lett. f CIAP)
Child Transportation Tender Annulled for Sub-Criteria Weighting Omission
Cited regarding the requirement for adequate award criteria in cantonal implementing provisions to ensure the most economically advantageous offer.
52.2021.510 · ti (art. 13 lett. i CIAP)
Challenge to Contract Award Based on Arbitrary Reference Price Reduction
Cited in conjunction with other rules regarding the conditions for interrupting a tender procedure (though the main decision focused on the second tender).
52.2021.501 · ti (art. 13 lett. d CIAP)
Ambulance Tender Exclusion Upheld Due to Missing Mandatory Documentation
Cited in the reasoning concerning the guarantee of an objective suitability verification procedure.
52.2018.472 · ti (art. 13 lett. c CIAP)
Bidder Challenge to Waste Collection Tender Over CIAP Applicability and Contract Terms
Relates to the minimum time limits for tender submissions, which were found to be insufficient.
52.2018.305 · ti (art. 13 cpv. 1 lett. a RLCPubb/CIAP)
Challenger v. Contracting Authority (Direct Award of Fire Department Vessels)
The court found that the conditions for using this provision to justify a direct award (no valid bids in a previous competition) were not met, as the previous competition was conducted incorrectly.
52.2018.304 · ti (art. 13 lett. d CIAP)
Appeal Regarding Fire Detection Contract Award Due to Director's Professional Registration Status
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the requirement for objective and verifiable suitability criteria, ultimately leading to the finding that CO 1's offer should have been excluded.
52.2016.101 · ti (art. 13 lett. f CIAP)
Challenger v. Public Authority Regarding Aqueduct Tender Evaluation Formula
Cited as part of the legal basis establishing the requirement for awarding contracts to the economically most advantageous bid, which the contested criterion violated.
52.2014.282 · ti (art. 13 lett. d CIAP)
Quarry Contract Award Annulled Due to Illegal Subcontracting and Missing Documentation
Used to justify the exclusion of the RI 1 consortium due to the inidoneity of one of its members (Tartini) regarding the CCL criterion.
52.2014.199 · ti (art. 13 lett. f CIAP)
Challenge to Municipal Waste Collection Tender Over Disposal Site Change
Cited in the reasoning (considerand 5.1) as the legal basis requiring the publication of award criteria ensuring selection based on the economically most advantageous offer.
52.2011.95 · ti (art. 13 cpv. 1 lett. g RLCPubb/CIAP)
Contractor Challenge to Direct Award for Nursing Home Call System Upgrade
This provision was cited as a basis for upholding the direct award procedure, concerning the awarding to the initial bidder to ensure interchangeability of material.
52.2010.233 · ti (art. 13 RLCPubb/CIAP)
Contract Award Overturned Due to Improper Procurement Procedure
Cited in the final orders in relation to justifying the direct assignment procedure, which was deemed inapplicable.
52.2007.303 · ti (art. 13 cpv. 1 lett. a RLCPubb/CIAP)
Consortium Appeal Over Formalism in Public Works Contract Award
Cited regarding the procedure the client must follow after the annulment of the award decision (direct assignment).
52.2007.127 · ti (art. 13 CIAP)
Tunnel Fire Detection Contract Award Appeal
Cited in the preamble to the decision ('visti gli art. 13, 15 CIAP;') as a legal basis for the decision, concerning the applicable procurement law.
52.2006.129 · ti (art. 13 CIAP)
Bid Exclusion Appeals in Public Tender for Construction Management Services
Cited in the final enumeration of applicable legal provisions.
52.2005.159 · ti (art. 13 CIAP)
Bidder Challenge to Municipality's Unlawful Abandonment of Waste Collection Contract Award
Cited in the final orders as a basis for the decision to partially accept the appeal.