730.500
CIAPIVöBCIMP
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 11 CIAP Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (CIAP)
CIAP
Art. 11 CIAP
Nell’aggiudicazione delle commesse vengono osservati i seguenti principi
a) non discriminazione e parità di trattamento tra gli offerenti;
b) concorrenza efficace;
c) divieto di negoziazioni;
d) rispetto delle norme di ricusa;
e) osservanza delle disposizioni in materia di protezione dei lavoratori nonché delle condizioni di lavoro;
f) parità di trattamento tra donna e uomo;
g) trattamento confidenziale delle informazioni.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (28)
52.2024.161 · ti (art. 11 cpv. 1 RLCPubb/CIAP)
Contractor Challenge to Award Based on Unduly Specific Technical Specifications
Cited in the reasoning stating that tender specifications must be based on standardized positions where possible, relevant to the found violation.
52.2024.161 · ti (art. 11 lett. a CIAP)
Contractor Challenge to Award Based on Unduly Specific Technical Specifications
Cited in the reasoning explaining the general binding nature of tender specifications, which relates to the main ground for annulment.
52.2019.489 · ti (art. 11 lett. c CIAP)
Hospital Contract Award Annulled Due to Bid Non-Compliance
Cited in the reasoning to support the principle that offers cannot be corrected after the deadline, relevant to excluding the awarded consortium in order 1.
52.2019.310 · ti (art. 11 cpv. 1 del regolamento di applicazione della legge sulle commesse pubbliche e del concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici del 12 settembre 2006; RLCPubb/CIAP)
Security Contract Award Annulled Due to Unlawful Specification Restrictions
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for standardisation in tender specifications (though not explicitly mentioned in the final orders, it is the ground for the partial acceptance in order 1, which leads to the cost orders).
52.2012.4 · ti (art. 11 lett. b CIAP)
RI 1 v. Municipality: Intellectual Theft in Public Procurement Award
Cited indirectly in the reasoning (Section 3.3) as part of the justification for excluding the offer due to unfair competition, which supports the final order to annul the decision.
52.2009.498 · ti (art. 11 CIAP)
Bidder Exclusion Upheld Due to Expired Collective Labor Agreement and Failure to Allow Remediation Period
Cited among the provisions used to sustain the acceptance of the appeal, related to the general principle of awarding contracts based on worker protection.
52.2002.244 · ti (art. 11 CIAP)
Consortium Appeal of Highway Maintenance Contract Award Based on Bid Non-Conformity
Cited among the provisions considered when making the final orders regarding the acceptance of the appeals.
52.2002.78 · ti (art. 11 CIAP)
Appeal Against Award of Heavy Traffic Control Contract Following Allegedly Predatory Bid
Cited in the final considerations as a basis for the decision regarding the scope of the CIAP.
52.2001.420 · ti (art. 11 lett. a CIAP)
Consortium Challenge to Public Contract Award Over Missing Mandatory Documents
Used to argue that the generalized regularization of offer deficiencies violates the principle of equal treatment.
52.2001.420 · ti (art. 11 lett. c CIAP)
Consortium Challenge to Public Contract Award Over Missing Mandatory Documents
Used to support the principle that the content of an offer cannot be modified or negotiated.
52.2001.420 · ti (art. 11 lett. g CIAP)
Consortium Challenge to Public Contract Award Over Missing Mandatory Documents
Cited to explain the limitation on the right to examine tender documents based on confidentiality of manufacturing or commercial secrets.
52.2001.427 · ti (art. 11 CIAP)
Construction Bid Exclusion for Missing Material Sample Upheld
Cited in the reasoning section concerning general award principles, which supports the exclusion based on incompleteness violating parity of treatment.
52.2001.260 · ti (art. 11 CIAP)
Consortia Appeals: Motorway Contract Award Over Overhead Charge Deviation
Cited in the final section listing the provisions applied, relating to principles like equal treatment and effective competition, which were central to rejecting the appeal grounds.
52.2001.126 · ti (Art. 11 lett. a CIAP)
Concessionaire Challenge to State Waste Incineration Tender Dismissed
The ground for rejecting the appeal regarding the non-discrimination claim related to selection criteria.
52.1998.90 · ti (art. 11, 12, 15, 16, 18 CIAP)
Land Consolidation Consortium Prequalification Ranking Appeal Dismissed
These articles relate to the public procurement law governing the selection criteria and the review of the administrative body's discretionary power, forming the substantive basis for rejecting the appeals regarding the selection process.