Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
730.500 CIAPIVöBCIMP CH-TI

Art. 10 CIAP Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (CIAP)

CIAP
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (24 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 10 CIAP

1 Il presente Concordato non è applicabile

a) alle commesse assegnate ad istituti per portatori di handicap, istituti di beneficenza e istituti di pena;

b) alle commesse assegnate nell’ambito di programmi d’aiuto all’agricoltura e alimentazione;

c) alle commesse riguardanti oggetti di comune responsabilità ed attuazione, aggiudicate in virtù di un trattato internazionale;

d) alle commesse aggiudicate a un’organizzazione internazionale in virtù di una speciale procedura;

e) alle commesse per l’acquisto di armi, munizioni o materiale bellico, nonché per la costruzione di infrastrutture belliche e di comando nell’ambito della difesa nazionale e dell’esercito.

2 Il committente non è tenuto ad aggiudicare una commessa conformemente alle disposizioni del presente Concordato

a) se con ciò sono in pericolo l’ordine pubblico o la sicurezza pubblica;

b) se ciò si rivela necessario per la tutela della salute e la vita dell’uomo, degli animali e dei vegetali;

c) se con ciò si violano i diritti inerenti la tutela della proprietà intellettuale.

← Art. 9 CIAP Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (CIAP) Art. 11 CIAP →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (28)

52.2018.429 · ti (art. 10 cpv. 2 lett. k RLCpubb/CIAP)
Municipality Tender Annulment Due to Indeterminate Evaluation Criteria
The court found that the tender documents did not sufficiently define the assessment framework for the criterion of the contractor's organization, violating this provision and the principle of transparency.
52.2014.199 · ti (art. 10 cpv. 2 lett. k RLCPubb/CIAP)
Challenge to Municipal Waste Collection Tender Over Disposal Site Change
Cited in the reasoning (considerand 5.1) to establish the requirement for award criteria and weighting to be included in the tender documents.
52.2014.131 · ti (art. 10 cpv. 2 lett. k RLCPubb/CIAP)
Construction Company v. Awarding Body (Flawed Evaluation Criteria)
Cited, along with art. 32 LCPubb, to establish that the evaluation criteria and method must be fully predetermined in the tender documents.
52.2014.104 · ti (art. 10 cpv. 2 lett. k RLCPubb/CIAP)
Bidder Challenges Contract Award Based on Opaque Evaluation Criteria for Work Schedule
Cited in the reasoning regarding the transparency requirement, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (1-5). Excluded based on rules.
52.2012.386 · ti (art. 10 cpv. 2 lett. k del regolamento di applicazione della legge sulle commesse pubbliche e del concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici del 12 settembre 2006; RLCPubb/CIAP))
Bid Challenge to Municipal Contract Award Based on Flawed Evaluation Criteria
Cited in the reasoning as the key provision whose violation (lack of prior definition of evaluation criteria) justifies the annulment of the decision.
52.2010.396 · ti (art. 10 RLCPubb/CIAP)
Administrative Contract Award Annulment for Lack of Transparent Evaluation Criteria
Cited in the final orders, related to the requirement for publication of award criteria and weighting in tender documents.
52.2010.267 · ti (art. 10, 38 RLCPubb/CIAP)
Exclusion from Public Tender for Insufficient Technical Staff
Cited in the final pronouncements, these articles concern the criteria for examining and excluding bidders based on eligibility requirements.
52.2010.157 · ti (art. 10 RLCPubb/CIAP)
Construction Company v. Public Authority Regarding Road Restoration Contract Award
Cited in the preamble concerning the requirement to specify award criteria and weighting in tender documents, which formed the basis for finding a violation of transparency.
52.2010.14 · ti (Art. 10 RLCPubb/CIAP)
Contractor Challenge to Road Paving Contract Award Based on Evaluation of Organizational Capacity
Cited in the final orders, this article likely pertains to the requirement to specify award criteria and weightings in tender documents.
52.2009.421 · ti (art. 10 RLCPubb/CIAP)
Public Contract Award Annulled for Lack of Justification in Quality Criterion Scoring
Cited in the final disposition as part of the legal basis, concerning the criteria and weighting in tender documents.
52.2009.376 · ti (Art. 10 RLCPubb/CIAP)
Challenge to Snow Removal Contract Award Based on Evaluation Criteria and Documentation
Cited in the reasoning concerning the requirement to indicate award criteria in the tender documents.
52.2009.195 · ti (art. 10 cpv. 2 lett. k RLCPubb/CIAP)
Annulment of Public Contract Award Due to Lack of Transparency in Reference Estimate Disclosure
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the requirement to state award criteria in the tender documents.
52.2007.407 · ti (art. 10 RLCPubb/CIAP)
Municipality's Annulment of Tender Upheld Due to Lack of Award Criteria
Cited in the final section for procedural context, concerning the obligation to define award criteria.
52.2007.191 · ti (art. 10 RLCPubb/CIAP)
Bidder Appeal Regarding Public Tender Specifications and Award for Medicine Supply
Cited in the final orders preamble, concerning the requirements for tender documents.
52.2007.80 · ti (art. 10 RLCPubb/CIAP)
Contractor Appeal Granted Due to Flawed Bid Evaluation Criteria
Cited among the provisions governing the merits of the decision, which resulted in the contract being awarded.