Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
730.500 CIAPIVöBCIMP CH-TI

Art. 1 CIAP Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (CIAP)

CIAP
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (24 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 1 CIAP

1 Il presente Concordato disciplina l’apertura reciproca degli appalti pubblici da parte dei Cantoni, dei Comuni e di altri enti preposti a compiti cantonali o comunali. Esso coinvolge anche terzi, sempre che questi siano vincolati da accordi internazionali.

2 Esso intende armonizzare le norme di aggiudicazione cantonali mediante principi stabiliti di comune accordo, come pure trasporre nel diritto cantonale gli impegni derivanti in particolare dal Governement Procurement Agreement (GPA) e dall’Accordo tra la Confederazione svizzera e la Comunità europea su alcuni aspetti relativi agli appalti pubblici.

3 In particolare i suoi obiettivi sono

a) promuovere un’efficace concorrenza tra gli offerenti;

b) g arantire la parità di trattamento tra tutti gli offerenti, nonché un’aggiudicazione imparziale;

c) assicurare la trasparenza della procedura di aggiudicazione;

d) c onsentire un impiego parsimonioso delle risorse finanziarie pubbliche.

Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (CIAP) Art. 2 CIAP →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (49)

52.2025.119 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 3 lett. a e d CIAP)
Child Transportation Tender Annulled for Sub-Criteria Weighting Omission
Cited as general principles governing award criteria (effective competition and frugal use of public resources).
52.2025.119 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 3 lett. c CIAP)
Child Transportation Tender Annulled for Sub-Criteria Weighting Omission
Cited in connection with the principle of transparency regarding the prior definition of award criteria.
52.2024.161 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 3 lett. b e c CIAP)
Contractor Challenge to Award Based on Unduly Specific Technical Specifications
Cited in the reasoning explaining the general binding nature of tender specifications, which relates to the main ground for annulment.
52.2023.407 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 3 lett. a e d CIAP)
Tender Exclusion Based on Partial Offer and Flawed Specifications
Cited in the reasoning as the overarching principles (competition/resource parsimony) violated by the flawed tender documents.
52.2022.243 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 3 lett. c CIAP)
Consortium Appeal on Public Contract Award Due to Undisclosed Evaluation Methodology
The verdict nullifies the award decision due to a violation of the transparency principle enshrined in this article.
52.2020.207 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 3 lett. b CIAP)
Bidder Challenge Regarding Municipal Waste Removal Contract Award
Cited in the reasoning to support the finding that not excluding the non-compliant bid violated the principle of equal treatment.
52.2019.489 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 3 lett. b e c CIAP)
Hospital Contract Award Annulled Due to Bid Non-Compliance
Cited in the reasoning to establish that bidding requirements bind the client regarding equal treatment and transparency, which formed the basis for annulling the award decision in order 1.
52.2018.472 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 3 lett. a CIAP)
Bidder Challenge to Waste Collection Tender Over CIAP Applicability and Contract Terms
Used implicitly to support the finding that the tacit renewal clause violates the principles of fair treatment and effective competition.
52.2018.472 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 3 lett. c CIAP)
Bidder Challenge to Waste Collection Tender Over CIAP Applicability and Contract Terms
Basis for annulling the tender notice due to a violation of the principle of transparency (omission of required publication in the FUSC/simap.ch).
52.2018.429 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 3 lett. c CIAP)
Municipality Tender Annulment Due to Indeterminate Evaluation Criteria
The insufficient definition of the assessment method for the 'organization' criterion violated the principle of transparency inherent in public procurement procedures.
52.2016.20 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 3 lett. a e b CIAP)
Municipality Insurance Contract Award Annulled Due to Procedural Flaws and Incorrect Evaluation
Cited in reasoning (Considerand 2.2) concerning the principles of equal treatment and effective competition that were violated by the nature of the contracted work.
52.2016.20 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 3 lett. c CIAP)
Municipality Insurance Contract Award Annulled Due to Procedural Flaws and Incorrect Evaluation
Cited in reasoning (Considerand 3) regarding the principle of transparency that informs public procurement procedures.
52.2014.282 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 3 lett. b e c CIAP)
Quarry Contract Award Annulled Due to Illegal Subcontracting and Missing Documentation
Cited to support the principle that the procuring entity must respect tender rules to avoid violating equality and transparency principles, in connection with the exclusion of CO 4.
52.2014.199 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 3 lett. a CIAP)
Challenge to Municipal Waste Collection Tender Over Disposal Site Change
Cited in the reasoning (considerand 5.2) as a general principle of public procurement law regarding the promotion of effective and free competition.
52.2014.199 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 3 lett. c CIAP)
Challenge to Municipal Waste Collection Tender Over Disposal Site Change
Cited in the reasoning (considerand 5.1 and 5.3) as a general principle of public procurement law regarding transparency, applied in the context of appealable criteria and environmental criteria.