730.100
LCPUBBLMP
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 45 LCPubb Legge sulle commesse pubbliche (LCPubb)
LCPubb
Art. 45 LCPubb
[51] 1 L’art. 14 della legge sui sussidi cantonali del 22 giugno 1994 si applica per i versamenti ai committenti che sono assoggettati alla presente legge quali beneficiari di sussidi. L’esigibilità del saldo del sussidio è subordinata alla prova del rispetto delle condizioni di legge, di gara e di contratto da parte degli aggiudicatari.
2 L’art. 16 della legge sui sussidi cantonali si applica quale conseguenza della violazione della presente legge da parte di committenti ad essa assoggettati quali beneficiari di sussidi.
[51] Art. modificato dalla L 10.4.2017; in vigore dal 1.1.2020 - BU 2019, 211; precedente modifica: BU 2011, 582.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (20)
52.2021.496 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 2 lett. b LCPubb)
Company Appeal of Fine for Unauthorized Subcontracting in Public Procurement
This provision defines the violation (subcontracting without the client's agreement) that served as the basis for rejecting the appeal.
52.2021.424 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 2 lett. b LCPubb)
Procurement Fine Upheld for Unauthorized Subcontracting and False Bid Disclosure
It is the primary ground for confirming the administrative penalty regarding unauthorized subcontracting.
52.2021.424 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 2 lett. c LCPubb)
Procurement Fine Upheld for Unauthorized Subcontracting and False Bid Disclosure
It is the primary ground for confirming the administrative penalty regarding obtaining the contract based on false statements.
52.2019.173 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 1 e 2 LCPubb)
Company Challenge to Exclusion from Public Contracts Following Unauthorized Sub-Contracting
The court partially upheld the appeal, annulling the previous order concerning the exclusion penalty, which was based on the finding of a serious violation under this article.
52.2015.551 · ti (Art. 45 cpv. 1 LCPubb)
State Council Decision Upheld: Company Fined for Unauthorized Sub-Contracting in Public Tender
The final order dismisses the appeals, implicitly confirming the application of this article as the basis for the sanction imposed by the State Council.
60.2015.387 · ti (art. 45, 45a e 45b LCPubb)
Cantonal Council Sanctions Administrative vs. Criminal Classification
These articles concerning administrative sanctions for public procurement violations were cited in the general invocation before the pronouncement, although the court found the appeal inadmissible based on procedural grounds.
52.2013.295 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 2 lett. b LCPubb)
Contractor Ban and Fine for Unapproved Subcontracting in Public Procurement
This provision defines the 'subappalto senza l'accordo del committente' (subcontracting without the client's agreement) as a serious violation, which is the basis for rejecting the appeal.
52.2007.336 · ti (art. 45 LCPubb)
Company Appeal Against Exclusion from Public Contracts Over Subcontracted Transport Irregularities
Cited in the preamble as a basis for the decision, which defines grounds for exclusion from contract awards, the subject matter of the dispute.
52.2007.261 · ti (art. 45 LCPubb)
Construction Company Exclusion Annulled Due to Insufficient Proof of Direct Knowledge of Subcontractor Fraud
Cited among the provisions defining the court's jurisdiction and applicable law, specifically discussed in relation to exclusion grounds.
52.2005.36 · ti (art. 45 LCPubb)
Unsuccessful Bidders Challenge Public Contract Award Based on Undisclosed Conflicts of Interest
This provision concerning sanctions for false indications is cited in the preamble to the dispositive orders, although the court ultimately only declared the decision illegitimate.
52.2005.36 · ti (art. 45 LCPubb)
Challengers v. Municipality regarding Contract Award Due to Undisclosed Directorship
Cited in the concluding list, relating to penalties for false statements which informed the reasoning.
52.2007.261 · ti (art. 45 LCPubb)
Public Tender Exclusion Annulled Due to Insufficient Proof of Bidder's Knowledge of Subcontractor Fraud
Cited in the context of discussing the requirements for exclusion based on previous misconduct (though found not met in the case).
52.2007.336 · ti (art. 45 LCPubb)
Cantonal Tribunal Overturns Exclusion of Company from Public Tenders Based on Subcontractor's Weighbridge Irregularities
The decision to annul the administrative sanction was based on an improper application of this article regarding serious violations.
52.2012.466 · ti (art. 45 LCPubb)
Cantonal Council Exclusion Annulled Due to Non-Award and Lack of Impediment to Competition
This article formed the basis for the annulled administrative penalty (exclusion from tenders).
52.2013.295 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 2 lett. b LCPubb)
Contractor Exclusion and Fine for Unauthorized Subcontracting in Public Tenders
This provision defines the serious violation (subcontracting without the client's agreement) which was the basis for sanctioning the appellant.