730.100
LCPUBBLMP
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 33 LCPubb Legge sulle commesse pubbliche (LCPubb)
LCPubb
Art. 33 LCPubb
1 La decisione di aggiudicazione, come pure quella di esclusione, è comunicata ai concorrenti.
2 Essa deve indicare succintamente i motivi che hanno condotto all’esclusione di determinati offerenti o offerte, i criteri di aggiudicazione adottati e i rimedi di diritto, con l’avvertenza che il ricorso non ha, per principio, effetto sospensivo.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (25)
52.2022.200 · ti (art. 33 cpv. 2 LCPubb)
Challenger v. Museum Surveillance Contract Award: Inconsistent Evaluation Criteria
Cited regarding the required content of an award decision.
52.2014.43 · ti (art. 33 cpv. 2 LCPubb)
Public Contract Award Challenge Regarding Unlisted Medicine Supply Limits
Cited in the reasoning detailing the minimum requirements for the motivation of an award decision.
52.2010.14 · ti (Art. 33 LCPubb)
Contractor Challenge to Road Paving Contract Award Based on Evaluation of Organizational Capacity
Cited in the final orders, this article likely relates to the procedure or publication rules for the tender.
52.2009.92 · ti (art. 33 cpv. 2 LCPubb)
Challenge to Inter-Municipal Planning Commission's Project Selection Upheld Despite Minor Procedural Flaw
Cited in the reasoning section specifying the content requirements for an award decision, including grounds for exclusion and remedies.
52.2009.421 · ti (art. 33 LCPubb)
Public Contract Award Annulled for Lack of Justification in Quality Criterion Scoring
Cited in the final disposition as part of the legal basis, likely related to the procedure or transparency in contracting.
52.2008.124 · ti (art. 33 LCPubb)
Bid Challenge Over Underwater Pipeline Contract Dismissed
Cited in the final order preamble, concerning the required content of the award decision.
52.2003.246 · ti (art. 33 cpv. 2 LCPubb)
Construction Company Appeal Regarding Material Retention Basin Contract Award
Cited in the preamble regarding the required content of the award decision (motivation, criteria, remedies).
52.2003.126 · ti (art. 33 LCPubb)
Contract Award Challenge Time-Barred Due to Missed Appeal Deadline
Cited in the preamble, relevant to the requirements for the decision being appealed.
52.2003.6 · ti (Art. 33 LCPubb)
Nursing Home Renovation Contract Award Appeal
Cited in the final preamble, concerning the required content of the award decision (motivation).
52.2002.188 · ti (art. 33 LCPubb)
Contract Award Annulled for Insufficient Justification and Post-Tender Alteration of Criteria
Cited among the provisions leading to the final ruling, concerning the mandatory written justification for award decisions.
52.2002.188 · ti (art. 33 cpv. 2 LCPubb)
Contract Award Annulled for Insufficient Justification and Post-Tender Alteration of Criteria
Cited in the reasoning regarding the justification required for award decisions, but not explicitly in the operative part for the final outcome.
52.2002.66 · ti (art. 32, 33 LCPubb)
Contractor Appeal on Public Works Contract Quality Scoring Upheld
These provisions are cited as the legal basis for rejecting the appeal and confirming the award decision.
52.2002.50 · ti (Art. 33 LCPubb)
Contract Award Annulled Due to Improper Use of Extraneous Quality Criteria in Public Tender
The court annulled the award decision because its reasoning regarding the quality criterion was deemed insufficient and not in line with the bidding documents.
52.2002.188 · ti (art. 33 LCPubb)
Consortium Award Decision Annulled Due to Insufficient Justification and Post-Bid Criteria Alteration
Cited in the preamble before the operative part, related to the content requirements for the award decision.
52.2002.188 · ti (art. 33 cpv. 2 LCPubb)
Consortium Award Decision Annulled Due to Insufficient Justification and Post-Bid Criteria Alteration
Cited for background reasoning regarding the content of the award decision.