730.100
LCPUBBLMP
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 32 LCPubb Legge sulle commesse pubbliche (LCPubb)
LCPubb
Art. 32 LCPubb
[41] 1 Il committente aggiudica la commessa a favore dell’offerta complessivamente più vantaggiosa determinata sulla scorta di diversi criteri, quali il termine, la qualità, il prezzo, la sua attendibilità, l’economicità, i costi di servizio, il servizio clientela, l’adeguatezza della prestazione, l’estetica, la compatibilità ambientale, la responsabilità sociale, la formazione e il perfezionamento degli apprendisti e il valore tecnico. La ponderazione di un singolo criterio non può superare il 50%.
2 I criteri di aggiudicazione devono essere indicati nei documenti del bando, in ordine di importanza.
3 Trattandosi di beni ampiamente standardizzati, l’aggiudicazione della commessa può avvenire anche tenendo conto unicamente del criterio del minor prezzo.
[41] Art. modificato dalla L 10.4.2017; in vigore dal 1.1.2020 - BU 2019, 211.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (176)
52.2024.290 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 1 LCPubb)
Consortium Appeal Over Municipal Flowerbed Maintenance Award Dismissed Despite Procedural Flaw
Cited in the reasoning as the general rule for contract award based on the most advantageous offer.
52.2022.200 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 1 LCPubb)
Challenger v. Museum Surveillance Contract Award: Inconsistent Evaluation Criteria
Cited regarding the obligation for the awarding authority to detail evaluation methods.
52.2022.200 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 1 LCPubb)
Challenger v. Museum Surveillance Contract Award: Inconsistent Evaluation Criteria
Cited to establish the criteria announced for the 'Contributo alla formazione professionale' evaluation.
52.2021.127 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 1 LCPubb)
Administrative Court Annuls Railway Design Tender Due to Over-Reliance on Quantitative Quality Criteria
Cited implicitly as the basis for finding an excess/abuse of discretion regarding the evaluation criteria, leading to the annulment of the tender.
52.2020.375 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 1 LCPubb)
Church Restoration Contract Award Annulled Due to Undefined Price Reliability Evaluation Method
Cited to explain the general criteria for awarding public contracts.
52.2016.629 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 1 LCPubb)
Challenge to Ultra-Broadband Plan Award Due to Insufficient Reference Verification
Cited in the reasoning section when discussing the criteria for awarding the contract (most advantageous offer).
52.2016.319 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 1 LCPubb)
Bidder Challenge to Hospital Contract Award Based on Scoring Irregularities and Invalid References
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the criteria for awarding the contract, although the direct application is in the dispositive via Art. 41 LCPubb.
52.2014.131 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 1 LCPubb)
Construction Company v. Awarding Body (Flawed Evaluation Criteria)
Cited as the general basis for awarding a contract to the most advantageous offer based on various criteria.
52.2014.104 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 1 LCPubb)
Bidder Challenges Contract Award Based on Opaque Evaluation Criteria for Work Schedule
Cited in the reasoning, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (1-5). Excluded based on rules.
52.2013.496 · ti (art. 32 LCPubb)
Contractor v. Municipality: Tender Annulment Based on Undisclosed Internal Estimate
The court found that the decision to waive the award was issued in violation of this law, relating to the criteria for awarding the contract.
52.2012.386 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 1 LCPubb)
Bid Challenge to Municipal Contract Award Based on Flawed Evaluation Criteria
Cited in the reasoning to establish the need for transparent award criteria, supporting the annulment order.
52.2012.85 · ti (art. 32 LCPubb)
Hospital Contract Award Annulled for Procurement Violations
Cited in the reasoning to state that the contract should have been awarded based on the offer submitted by CO 1.
52.2010.157 · ti (art. 32 LCPubb)
Construction Company v. Public Authority Regarding Road Restoration Contract Award
Cited in the preamble to establish the general legal standard for awarding a contract based on the most advantageous offer criteria.
52.2010.14 · ti (Art. 32 LCPubb)
Contractor Challenge to Road Paving Contract Award Based on Evaluation of Organizational Capacity
Cited in the final orders, this article governs the criteria for awarding the contract to the most advantageous bid.
52.2004.239 · ti (Art. 32 LCPubb)
Bidder Exclusion Upheld Based on Association with Tax-Delinquent Entity
Cited in the final orders, this article concerns the procedure or decision-making regarding public contracts.