730.100
LCPUBBLMP
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 29 LCPubb Legge sulle commesse pubbliche (LCPubb)
LCPubb
Art. 29 LCPubb
Offerte deroganti dai moduli e dai progetti, oppure varianti nei metodi e programmi di esecuzione sono ammesse unicamente nei casi contemplati nell’avviso di gara.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (18)
52.2006.246 · ti (Art. 29 LCPubb)
Bidder Appeal Regarding Door Opening Mechanism Compliance in Contract Award
Cited in the final order listing, concerning the rules for variants in tenders, which was relevant to the reasoning for rejecting the CO 1 offer.
52.2005.249 · ti (art. 29 LCPubb)
Appeal Against Municipal Contract Award Over Flawed Kitchen Furnishings Tender Specifications
Cited in the final orders as a procedural basis for the court's decision, related to the admissibility of alternative offers.
52.2005.185 · ti (Art. 29 LCPubb)
Bidder Exclusion for Multiple Unsolicited Product Variants
Cited as a primary legal ground for rejecting the appeal because the submitted offer constituted an inadmissible variant.
52.2005.114 · ti (Art. 29 LCPubb)
Appeal Regarding Public Contract Award Based on Inadmissible Tender Variant
This article, which regulates the admission of variants, is cited in the framework of the decision that rejected the appeal on this basis.
52.2005.85 · ti (art. 29 LCPubb)
Contract Award Dispute over Underground Waste Containers Specifications
Cited in the preamble to the dispositive, although the reasoning for rejecting the appeal was primarily based on other provisions.
52.2004.277 · ti (art. 29 LCPubb)
Waste Collection Contract Award Overturned Due to Material Bid Non-Compliance
This article, concerning variants in tenders, is cited as one of the grounds for excluding the respondent's offer.
52.2003.198 · ti (art. 29 LCPubb)
Construction Authority Tender Award Upheld Despite Flawed Exclusion Basis
Deals with inadmissible variations in offers.
52.2002.503 · ti (art. 29 LCPubb)
School Furniture Contract Award Challenge Dismissed Due to Material Non-Conformity
Cited in the reasoning to support the principle that non-conforming offers must be excluded.
52.2001.317 · ti (Art. 29 LCPubb)
Contract Award Based on Corrected Tender Bid Violated Equal Treatment
Cited in the final orders preamble, it establishes the mandatory correspondence between the tender specifications and the winning bid, which was the core issue.
52.2001.317 · ti (art. 29 LCPubb)
Challange to Municipal Aqueduct Plumbing Contract Award Due to Post-Submission Bid Correction
Cited as the legal basis establishing that the award was based on an offer diverging from the erroneous tender specifications.
52.2003.198 · ti (art. 29 LCPubb)
Gardening Works Contract Award: Unjustified Exclusion Affirmed Despite Procedural Flaws in Award Decision
Cited regarding the inadmissibility of alternative product offers as an impermissible variant.
52.2004.277 · ti (art. 29 LCPubb)
Bidder Challenge Upheld: Municipal Waste Container Award Annulled Due to Non-Conforming Bid
Cited in the final orders as the legal basis for the decision regarding the appeal.
52.2005.114 · ti (art. 29 LCPubb)
Municipality Waste Container Contract Variant Bid Exclusion Upheld
Cited as a provision governing variants in offers, which was central to the reasoning leading to the rejection of the appeal.
52.2005.185 · ti (art. 29, LCPubb)
Company v. Municipality Regarding Tender Product Variants
This article, which deals with the admissibility of variants in tenders, was cited as the primary legal basis for rejecting the appeal.
52.2005.249 · ti (art. 29 LCPubb)
Cantonal Court Nullifies Award Over Flawed Tender Specifications Referencing Specific Brand
Cited in the final considerations, relating to the rules for offers deviating from the specifications.