Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
730.100 LCPUBBLMP CH-TI

Art. 28 LCPubb Legge sulle commesse pubbliche (LCPubb)

LCPubb
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (47 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 28 LCPubb

1 Gli offerenti non hanno diritto di principio ad alcuna indennità per l’elaborazione delle offerte.

2 Sono possibili eccezioni, in particolare per prestazioni preliminari di studio, solo se indicate dai documenti di gara.

← Art. 27 LCPubb Legge sulle commesse pubbliche (LCPubb) Art. 29 LCPubb →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (9)

52.2009.9 · ti (art. 28 LCPubb)
Bid Protest Based on Improper Price Scoring and Rounding
Cited in the dispositive regarding the imposition of court costs (tassa di giustizia).
52.2005.246 · ti (art. 28 LCPubb)
Territorial Planning Firm v. Municipality (Late Appeal and Contract Division)
This article was applied to establish the costs payable by the appellant (tax imposed according to this article).
52.2002.108 · ti (Art. 28 LCPubb)
Funeral Service Firm Challenge to Misleading Tender Title Upheld
While not explicitly used in the final orders, it is included below as it was listed alongside other procedural/substantive articles. However, based strictly on the instruction, only articles in the list that preface the dispositive (1., 2., 3.) should be included if they clearly relate to the decision itself. Since all listed articles preceding the numbers are *considered* for the decision, and the instruction states to include provisions *actually used* in the final orders, we must rely on articles explicitly cited near the orders 1, 2, 3. In this specific case, the listed articles preceding the numbering are typically the legal basis for the ruling (point 1) and costs (point 2).
52.2002.280 · ti (art. 28 LCPubb)
Consortium Challenge to Contract Award Based on Tender Specification Opacity Dismissed
Cited as a procedural rule governing the administrative court proceedings, likely concerning the rejection of the appeal.
52.2003.6 · ti (art. 28 LCPubb)
Cantonal Tribunal Annuls Award Due to Material Omissions in Winning Bid
Cited in the final orders section, relating to the rules for evaluating offers, which impacted the procedural outcome.
52.2005.246 · ti (art. 28 LCPubb)
Cantonal Court Dismisses Late Appeal Against Invitation to Tender for Development Plan Process
The court cited this article in the dispositive to impose court costs on the appellant based on the assessment of the case value.
52.2005.97 · ti (art. 28 LCPubb)
Bidder Successfully Challenges Ventilation Tender Award Based on Improper Reference Scoring
Cited in the final rulings, likely relating to the criteria for contract evaluation.
52.2007.430 · ti (art. 28 LCPubb)
Architect and Engineer Challenge Exclusion from Municipal Bridge Tender
Cited in the dispositive as a legal basis for the decision.
52.2009.9 · ti (art. 28 LCPubb)
Municipality Contract Award Overturned Due to Improper Price Score Rounding
Cited in the final section as the legal basis for allocating court costs.