Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
730.100 LCPUBBLMP CH-TI

Art. 25 LCPubb Legge sulle commesse pubbliche (LCPubb)

LCPubb
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (47 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 25 LCPubb

Il committente esclude dalla procedura o revoca l’aggiudicazione e può sciogliere il contratto con gli offerenti o aggiudicatari che, segnatamente, nella gara o dopo l’aggiudicazione e sino al termine dell’esecuzione della prestazione contrattuale

a) non adempiono ai criteri di idoneità;

b) hanno dato o danno al committente indicazioni false; [31]

c) non rispettano i principi sanciti all’art. 5 lett. a) e b); [32]

d) hanno comportamenti tali da impedire un’effettiva e libera concorrenza o da ostacolarla in modo rilevante;

e) sono oggetto di una procedura di concordato o di fallimento;

f) hanno i medesimi titolari di offerenti che non adempiono ai principi dell’art. 5 o sono controllati dalle stesse persone; [33]

g) hanno i medesimi titolari o sono controllati dalle stesse persone riferibili a offerenti già esclusi per sanzione . [34]

[31] Lett. modificata dalla L 10.4.2017; in vigore dal 1.1.2020 - BU 2019, 211.

[32] Lett. modificata dalla L 10.4.2017; in vigore dal 1.1.2020 - BU 2019, 211.

[33] Lett. modificata dalla L 19.10.2011; in vigore dal 13.12.2011 - BU 2011, 582.

[34] Lett. modificata dalla L 10.4.2017; in vigore dal 1.1.2020 - BU 2019, 211; precedente modifica: BU 2011, 582.

← Art. 24 LCPubb Legge sulle commesse pubbliche (LCPubb) Art. 26 LCPubb →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (115)

52.2024.459 · ti (Art. 25 lett. a LCPubb)
Annulment of Mandate Award Due to Lack of FINMA Registration
The appeal was granted because the successful bidder's offer had to be excluded for ineligibility based on this provision.
52.2022.59 · ti (Art. 25 lett. f LCPubb)
School Transport Tender Exclusion Upheld Due to Related Entity's Labor Law Non-Compliance
This provision was the basis for excluding the appellant from the tender procedure.
52.2021.480 · ti (Art. 25 lett. b LCPubb)
Appeal Against Contract Award Based on Unreliable Bidding Information
This provision was the main ground for annulling the contested decision because the awarded bidder provided false indications regarding the time estimates.
52.2021.501 · ti (art. 25 lett. c LCPubb)
Ambulance Tender Exclusion Upheld Due to Missing Mandatory Documentation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the exclusion of bidders who do not comply with the principles set out in Art. 5 letter a LCPubb.
52.2021.214 · ti (art. 25 lett. a LCPubb)
Bid Challenge Dismissed Over Subcontractor Permit Validity in Waste Management Contract
Cited in the reasoning section (2) regarding the exclusion of non-compliant bidders, supporting the main decision to reject the appeal (order 1).
52.2021.246 · ti (Art. 25 lett. a LCPubb)
Appeal Regarding Public Parking Garage Construction Management Contract Award Over Self-Reference and Bid Reliability Assessment
Cited as the legal basis for excluding the awarded party for failing to meet an eligibility criterion (the reference requirement).
52.2021.257 · ti (art. 25 lett. b LCPubb)
Cleaning Services Contract Award Annulled Over Arithmetic and Time Estimate Discrepancies
This provision defines the ground for excluding the favored bidder (providing false information), which is the potential consequence if the investigation requested in order 1.2 confirms the unfeasibility of the proposed execution times.
52.2020.389 · ti (art. 25 lett. a LCPubb)
Bidder Exclusion Upheld for Failure to Produce Required Building Permit in Public Works Contract
The appeal was rejected because the appellant's offer was correctly excluded from the procedure for failing to meet the suitability criteria.
52.2020.378 · ti (art. 25 lett. b LCPubb)
Bidder Exclusion Over Sub-Cost Offer Annulled Due to Flawed Evaluation Methodology
The primary reason for the initial decision's annulment was the lack of legal basis/proper procedure for excluding the appellant based on the 'sottocosto' (under-cost) assessment, which is linked to the provision cited by the respondent.
52.2020.61 · ti (Art. 25 lett. a LCPubb)
Consortium Exclusion Upheld; Winning Bidder Also Disqualified on Managerial Capacity
Basis for annulling the award decision because the winning bidder failed to meet the eligibility criteria.
52.2019.620 · ti (art. 25 lett. a LCPubb)
Contract Award Annulment for Failure to Meet Registration Requirements
Used to justify the exclusion of the winning bidder for failing to meet the suitability criteria.
52.2019.170 · ti (art. 25 lett. a LCPubb)
Construction Company Bid Exclusion Upheld on Registration Length
The appeal was rejected because the appellant's exclusion from the tender process was justified under this provision for failure to meet eligibility criteria.
52.2018.600 · ti (art. 25 lett. a LCPubb)
Public Contract Award Challenged Over Unmet Reference Requirements and Equal Treatment Breach
Cited as the legal basis for the necessary exclusion of the winning bidder due to non-compliance with eligibility criteria.
52.2018.573 · ti (art. 25 lett. a LCPubb)
Public Works Competition Door Supply Exclusion Affirmation
The appeal was rejected based on the exclusion of the appellant from the tender, citing this article for the failure to meet suitability criteria.
52.2018.310 · ti (Art. 25 lett. a LCPubb)
Public Contract Award: Exclusion for Lack of Principal Contractor Authorization
Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis for excluding a bidder based on non-compliance with suitability criteria, which justifies rejecting the appeal in order 1.