730.100
LCPUBBLMP
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 23 LCPubb Legge sulle commesse pubbliche (LCPubb)
LCPubb
Art. 23 LCPubb
[26] 1 Il consorzio tra offerenti è di principio ammesso.
2 Il committente può tuttavia limitare o escludere questa possibilità nel bando.
3 Ogni consorziato deve rispettare tutti i requisiti richiesti dalla presente legge e può partecipare, di regola, ad un unico consorzio, ad eccezione del caso in cui riveste ruolo manifestamente subalterno.
4 Il consorzio deve essere provato in forma scritta e prevedere la responsabilità solidale e illimitata di ogni suo membro verso il committente per l’esecuzione della prestazione oggetto della commessa e per il rispetto dei requisiti di legge e di contratto.
[26] Art. modificato dalla L 10.4.2017; in vigore dal 1.1.2020 - BU 2019, 211.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (15)
52.2020.61 · ti (Art. 23 cpv. 3 LCPubb)
Consortium Exclusion Upheld; Winning Bidder Also Disqualified on Managerial Capacity
Cited implicitly as the basis for requiring all consortium members to meet eligibility requirements, justifying the appellant's exclusion.
52.2014.201 · ti (art. 23 cpv. 1 e 2 LCPubb)
Municipality Direct Award Challenge Fails Due to Lack of Standing
Cited during the reasoning regarding the formation of consortia in public procurement.
52.2006.153 · ti (art. 23 cpv. 2 LCPubb)
Public Tender Challenge: Subcontracting Restriction in Soccer Field Construction
Cited in the preamble to the decision regarding the exclusion of consortia, which was relevant context for the final decision to reject the appeal.
52.2005.320 · ti (art. 23 LCPubb)
Facade Restoration Tender Lead Bidder Requirement Upheld
Cited in the preamble of the decision, relating to the admission of consortiums.
52.2004.354 · ti (Art. 23 cpv. 1 LCPubb)
Exclusion of Consortia in Sludge Transport Tender Upheld Despite Competition Concerns
While the article itself deals with the admission of consortiums, it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive; however, it is part of the set of articles listed in the preamble ('visti gli art.') which sets the legal framework for the decision.
52.2002.35 · ti (Art. 23 LCPubb)
Appeal Against Municipal Contract Award Based on Consortium Composition and Eligibility Failures
Cited as part of the legal basis for the decision, specifically concerning consortium rules which led to the offer's exclusion.
52.2002.35 · ti (art. 23 LCPubb)
Canton of Ticino: Annulment of Contract Award Due to Irregular Consortium Composition and Failure to Meet Eligibility Requirements
Cited as part of the legal basis governing consortia (joint ventures) in tendering procedures.
52.2005.320 · ti (art. 23 LCPubb)
Contractor Challenge to Public Tender Requirements on Grounds of Unjustified Limitation to Construction Companies
Cited in the list preceding the orders regarding consortium arrangements.
52.2005.433 · ti (Art. 23 LCPubb)
RI 1 v. Public Authority: Lawfulness of Bid Exclusion for Prohibited Subcontracting in Procurement
Cited in the preamble to the dispositive concerning substantive law application, forming part of the legal basis considered by the court.
52.2006.153 · ti (Art. 23 LCPubb)
Specialized Company Challenge to Infrastructure Tender Subcontracting Restriction Upheld
Cited in the concluding section as a legal basis, regarding consortiums.
52.2006.153 · ti (Art. 23 LCPubb)
Specialized Company Challenge to Infrastructure Tender Subcontracting Restriction Upheld
Cited in the concluding section as a legal basis, regarding the general admission of consortiums.
52.2006.153 · ti (Art. 23 cpv. 2 LCPubb)
Specialized Company Challenge to Infrastructure Tender Subcontracting Restriction Upheld
Cited in the concluding section as a legal basis, concerning the limitation of consortium possibilities.
52.2006.153 · ti (Art. 23, LCPubb)
Specialized Company Challenge to Infrastructure Tender Subcontracting Restriction Upheld
Cited in the reasoning section (though not explicitly in the list before the dispositive, it is intrinsically linked to the substantive review) regarding consortiums, but is NOT included here as the explicit citation list before the dispositive is the primary source, and the actual operative part (1., 2.) does not cite it or any related article justifying the rejection of the appeal.
52.2020.408 · ti (art. 23 cpv. 1 LCPubb)
Cantonal Tribunal Upholds Integrated Carpentry and Cladding Tender Specifications
Cited in the reasoning concerning the possibility of consortia between bidders.
52.2020.408 · ti (art. 23 cpv. 2 LCPubb)
Cantonal Tribunal Upholds Integrated Carpentry and Cladding Tender Specifications
Cited in the reasoning concerning the possibility of limiting consortia by the contracting authority.