Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
730.100 LCPUBBLMP CH-TI

Art. 1 LCPubb Legge sulle commesse pubbliche (LCPubb)

LCPubb
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (47 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 1 LCPubb

[2] 1 La presente legge disciplina la procedura per l’assegnazione di commesse pubbliche e ha lo scopo di garantire il rispetto dei seguenti principi

a) la parità di trattamento tra gli offerenti;

b) una concorrenza efficace;

c) la trasparenza;

d) la qualità;

e) l’impiego parsimonioso delle risorse finanziarie pubbliche.

2 Essa garantisce, con condizione di reciprocità, la non discriminazione di coloro che hanno il proprio domicilio o la propria sede in Svizzera, il rispetto dei vincoli determinati dagli obblighi internazionali della Confederazione e del Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici.

[2] Art. modificato dalla L 10.4.2017; in vigore dal 1.1.2020 - BU 2019, 211.

Legge sulle commesse pubbliche (LCPubb) Art. 2 LCPubb →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (175)

52.2024.290 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 1 lett. a e c LCPubb)
Consortium Appeal Over Municipal Flowerbed Maintenance Award Dismissed Despite Procedural Flaw
Cited in the reasoning regarding the binding nature of the tender rules for the awarding authority.
52.2024.290 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 1 lett. c LCPubb)
Consortium Appeal Over Municipal Flowerbed Maintenance Award Dismissed Despite Procedural Flaw
Cited in the reasoning to explain the principle of transparency underlying the requirement to pre-determine award criteria.
52.2023.470 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 1 lett. b ed e LCPubb)
Foundation's Portfolio Award Annulled Over Flawed Financial Evaluation Criterion
Cited as the core principles violated by the flawed evaluation criteria, justifying the annulment of the procedure and decision.
52.2022.200 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 1 lett. a e c LCPubb)
Challenger v. Museum Surveillance Contract Award: Inconsistent Evaluation Criteria
Cited in connection with the principles of equal treatment and transparency which must be respected by the awarding authority.
52.2022.252 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 1 lett. a e c LCPubb)
Municipal Contract Award Based on Vehicle Ownership Requirement
Cited as the general principles (equality of treatment and transparency) underpinning the binding nature of the tender specifications.
52.2021.513 · ti (art. 1 lett. a e c LCPubb)
Bidder Challenge to Public Contract Award Based on Technical Evaluation and Non-Compliant Base Offer
Cited as general principles of public procurement law violated by non-conforming offers (in reasoning context).
52.2021.305 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 1 lett. b LCPubb)
Challenge to Public Tender Award Criteria for Wood Chip Supply Upheld
The criteria were confirmed as non-prejudicial to the principle of effective competition, which is the goal of this provision.
52.2021.214 · ti (art. 1 lett. a e c LCPubb)
Bid Challenge Dismissed Over Subcontractor Permit Validity in Waste Management Contract
Cited in the reasoning section (2) regarding the principles of legality, equal treatment, and transparency governing public procurement, supporting the rejection of the appeal (order 1).
52.2020.375 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 1 lett. c LCPubb)
Church Restoration Contract Award Annulled Due to Undefined Price Reliability Evaluation Method
Cited implicitly through reference to the principle of transparency which was violated by not defining the evaluation method for 'attendibilità del prezzo'.
52.2020.218 · ti (art. 1 lett. a e c LCPubb)
Municipality's Arbitrary Rejection of Highest-Scoring Bid in Public Procurement
Cited as the fundamental principles (transparency and equal treatment) that the authority could not violate, even in an informal procedure.
52.2019.629 · ti (art. 1 lett. c LCPubb)
Contractor Appeal: Annulment of Municipal Waste Bag Contract Award Over Missing Certification and Non-Compliant Specifications
Cited in the reasoning section to uphold the principle of equal treatment, although not explicitly in the operative part, it is contextually related to the ground for the decision (non-conformity of the bid).
52.2019.310 · ti (art. 1 lett. b LCPubb)
Security Contract Award Annulled Due to Unlawful Specification Restrictions
Cited in the reasoning as the foundational principle of free competition violated by the flawed tender specifications (though not explicitly mentioned in the final orders, it is the ground for the partial acceptance in order 1, which leads to the cost orders).
52.2019.51 · ti (art. 1 lett. b e d LCPubb)
Public Tender Qualification Criteria Exclusion Overruled
This provision is cited contextually in the reasoning regarding the general principles governing public procurement (competition and parsimonious use of resources) which the award criteria must respect.
52.2018.272 · ti (art. 1 lett. c LCPubb)
Consortium Energy Strategy Contract Dispute and Conflict of Interest Exclusion
Cited because the lower court's failure to exclude the appellant violated the principle of equal treatment enshrined in this article.
52.2018.398 · ti (art. 1 lett. c LCPubb)
Tender Exclusion Upheld, Contract Award Overturned for Missing Labor Declaration Requiring Final Remedial Deadline
Cited as the legal principle violated by allowing non-compliant offers, which underpins the decision to overturn the contract award.