414.110
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 37 Regolamento delle scuole medie superiori Regolamento delle scuole medie superiori
Art. 37 Regolamento delle scuole medie superiori
1 Ogni docente programma il proprio insegnamento e espone il proprio piano agli allievi all’inizio dell’anno scolastico.
2 In qualsiasi momento dell’anno scolastico il docente deve essere in grado di documentare lo stato raggiunto nello svolgimento del programma, nonché gli elementi di valutazione di cui dispone.
3 Al docente può essere richiesto di consegnare una copia del suo piano di lavoro all’esperto di materia e alla direzione di istituto.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (35)
B-988/2026 (Art. 37 al. 1 loi sur les EPF)
Applicant's Exmatriculation Lawful Due to Unmet GPA Condition
Establishes that the general provisions of federal law govern appeal procedures before the Federal Administrative Court unless otherwise specified.
A-3131/2023 (Art. 37 Abs. 1 ETH-Gesetz i.V.m. Art. 33 Bst. f VGG)
University Reprimand for "Lying Schemer" Email Upheld
These provisions establish the appealability of decisions from the ETH Complaints Commission to the Federal Administrative Court.
B-2834/2025 (Art. 37 Abs. 1 ETH-Gesetz)
Suspension of Student Accommodation Proceedings Upheld Pending Related Litigation
This provision is cited for the jurisdiction of the Federal Administrative Court and the possibility for the ETH Complaint Commission to stay proceedings.
B-3001/2023 (Art. 37 al. 1 loi sur les EPF)
Student granted second attempt at master's project due to server access issues
Cited as the basis for applying general federal procedural law to EPF appeals.
B-616/2023 (Art. 37 Abs. 1 ETH-Gesetz)
Student Exclusion Upheld Despite Late ADHD Accommodation Claim
This provision states that decisions of the ETH Complaints Commission are appealable to the Federal Administrative Court.
A-3863/2022 (Art. 37 Abs. 1 ETH-Gesetz)
*Res Judicata* Bars Repetitive Parking Permit Claim
Specifies that decisions of the ETH Complaints Commission are appealable to the Federal Administrative Court.
B-2238/2022 (Art. 37 al. 1 de la loi sur les EPF)
University Dismissal Upheld: Exam Retake Rules Apply at Time of Repetition
States that the general provisions of federal law govern the appeals procedure unless otherwise specified.
B-1305/2022 (Art. 37 al. 3 Loi sur les EPF)
Federal Administrative Court: Whistleblower Lacks Party Status in Authorship Dispute
Used to determine whether the contested decision is a formal decision that can be appealed.
A-512/2020 (Art. 37 Abs. 3 ETH-Gesetz)
Professor's Reputation Damage Claim Denied
This provision dictates the procedural path for appeals against decisions of ETH Zurich, specifically noting that appeals based on the VG are an exception and can be directly brought before the Federal Administrative Court.
A-3974/2020 (Art. 37 Abs. 3 Satz 2 ETH-Gesetz)
Educational Institution's Duty of Care Claims Competency
Cited to confirm that appeals against ETHZ decisions based on the liability law are not subject to the ETH complaint commission.
A-2823/2019 (Art. 37 Abs. 1 ETH-Gesetz)
Administrative Investigation Report Not Appealable Decision
This provision is cited to establish the general appealability of decisions from the ETH Complaints Commission to the Federal Administrative Court.
A-5189/2019 (Art. 37 Abs. 3 ETH-Gesetz)
Federal Administrative Court: Warning Letter Data Deletion and Target Agreement Formal Decision
Establishes the jurisdiction of the ETH-Beschwerdekommission and, by extension, the Federal Administrative Court for appeals against decisions of ETH Zurich.
A-2852/2018 (Art. 37 al. 1 loi sur les EPF)
Academic Institution's Remedial Course Requirement Lawful
Stated that the procedure for appeals concerning EPFs is governed by general federal procedural law unless otherwise specified.
A-2863/2018 (Art. 37 al. 1 loi sur les EPF)
University Regulation of Study Programs Upheld
The court applied the general provisions of federal procedure to the appeal process.
A-2863/2018 (Art. 37 al. 2 loi sur les EPF)
University Regulation of Study Programs Upheld
The EPFL has the standing to appeal the decision of the CRIEPF as it was the first instance authority.