280.200
LPR
CH-TI
Art. 28 LPR Legge sulla procedura di ricorso in materia di esecuzione e fallimento (LPR)
LPR
Art. 28 LPR
1 La domanda di revisione di una sentenza si propone entro dieci giorni dalla notifica all’Autorità di vigilanza che ha giudicato.
2 La domanda è notificata alle parti che, entro il termine di dieci giorni, possono inoltrare le loro osservazioni.
3 Nelle esecuzioni cambiarie il termine è ridotto a cinque giorni.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (11)
15.2024.136 · ti (art. 28 cpv. 1 della Legge cantonale sulla procedura di ricorso in materia di esecuzione e fallimento (LPR, RL 280.200))
Supervisory Authority Rejects Revision of Attachment Notice Dismissal
Cited in the reasoning (Considerand 1) regarding the deadline for submitting the revision application, although not explicitly in the dispositive orders.
15.2022.150 · ti (art. 28 cpv. 1 LPR)
Abusive Execution Proceedings Based on Repeated Unpursued Attempts
Cited in point 5 regarding the inadmissibility of certain arguments, relating to the recourse to the Cantonal Supervisory Authority.
15.2022.151 · ti (art. 28 cpv. 1 LPR)
Abusive Execution Proceedings and Good Faith Obligation
Cited as the procedural basis for a potential appeal to the Federal Court regarding specific previously decided matters, relating to appellate review mechanisms.
15.2012.117 · ti (Art. 28 LPR)
Application for Review of Garnishment Order Timeliness and Merits
Cited in the pronouncement preamble, related to the admissibility/timeliness of the revision request.
15.2004.37 · ti (art. 28 cpv. 1 LPR)
Revision Request Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing
Cited as the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible due to tardiness.
15.1997.66 · ti (art. 28 cpv.1 LPR)
Revision Request Inadmissible Due to Untimely Filing
This article governs the deadline for submitting a revision application, which served as the main ground for declaring the application inadmissible (Order 1).
15.1997.14 · ti (art. 28 cpv.1 LPR)
Automobile Seizure Revision Timeliness
This procedural rule regarding the deadline for filing the request for revision was implicitly used to determine the inadmissibility mentioned in order 1, as discussed extensively in the reasoning.
15.2004.37 · ti (art. 28 LPR)
Revision Application Timeliness under Supervisory Procedure Law
The revision application was rejected as inadmissible due to being filed late, contrary to the deadline set in this article.
15.2012.117 · ti (art. 28 LPR)
Debtor's Late Revision Request Regarding Garnishment and Family Allowance Exclusion
Cited among the provisions governing the decision, concerning the deadline for the revision request.
15.2019.54 · ti (art. 28 cpv. 1 LPR)
Creditor's Appeal Challenging Refusal to Reconsider Existential Minimum and Order Complementary Attachment Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning (2.) concerning the missed deadline for revision.
15.2022.151 · ti (art. 28 cpv. 1 LPR)
Creditor's Repeated Enforcement Requests as Abuse of Rights
Inadmissibility mentioned for previously decided issues, although not directly applied in the final operative part dismissing the appeal.