Art. 7 LStip Legge sugli stipendi degli impiegati dello Stato e dei docenti (LStip)

52.2019.464 · ti (art. 7 cpv. 3 LStip)

State Employee Salary Classification Appeal

The court ruled that the application of this provision to the appellant's promotion was manifestly contrary to the law, leading to the annulment of the challenged decision.

53.2008.2 · ti (Art. 7 LStip)

Instructor v. State Regarding Service Seniority and Salary Adjustment

Cited as a relevant legal basis, although the application of its paragraph 3 was rejected, the general rule (par. 1) informs the salary recognition.

53.2006.32 · ti (art. 7 LStip)

Teacher v. State Over Salary Retroactive Raises and Freeze

Cited as a legal basis relevant to the overall decision regarding salary calculations upon advancement.

53.2005.26 · ti (art. 7 LStip)

Teacher Overtime Pay Denial for Health-Reduced Workload

Cited in the final pronouncements, although not explicitly detailed in the reasoning for the dismissal, likely relating to general stipulations for employees.

53.2006.28 · ti (Art. 7 LStip)

Employee v. State Salary Classification Retroactive Adjustment

Cited as the legal basis for determining the initial salary and increases, and applied in dismissing the petition.

53.2002.28 · ti (Art. 7 LStip)

Educator Denied Higher Salary Classification Based on Prior Auxiliary Status

Cited in the preliminary considerations, but not directly used in the dispositive orders, except indirectly as part of the framework leading to the rejection.

53.2000.33 · ti (art. 7, 7a, 11 LStip)

Employee Salary Confirmation Dispute Under Reclassification Statute

These articles are the core legal provisions concerning salary, extraordinary increases, and recalculations in cases of promotion, advancement, or reclassification of a function, which formed the basis of the dispute and the court's decision.

53.2000.2 · ti (art. 7 cpv. 3 LStip)

Employee Salary Reduction Appeal in Higher Education

This article was the substantive basis cited in the reasoning for the initial salary reduction, which the final decision upheld by rejecting the petition.

53.1999.3 · ti (Art. 7 LStip)

Teacher Salary Classification Appeal

This provision was the legal basis for the initial salary reduction that the petitioner contested, and the court confirmed its application in dismissing the petition.

52.2012.273 · ti (art. 7 LStip)

Employee Salary Reduction and Denial of Annual Increase Challenge

The 3% reduction on the initial salary was suppressed because it was not based on the employee's capacity, as required by this article.

53.2000.32 · ti (art. 7, 7a, 11 LStip)

Public Employee Salary Reclassification Merit Increase Dispute

These articles of the Salary Law were the substantive provisions applied to determine the outcome regarding the extraordinary salary increase upon reclassification.

53.2002.28 · ti (Art. 7 LStip)

State Employee Salary Classification Discrimination Claim Rejected

This article is cited in the reasoning but NOT in the final operative section 1, 2, or 3. However, since the court reviewed the decision based on the salary setting power derived from it, and it is listed among the general 'visti gli artt...', it is included here based on the instruction to include those provisions listed at the end, outside the numbered steps, which generally support the entire judgment.

53.2006.28 · ti (Art. 7 LStip)

Teacher Salary Seniority Appeal Regarding Substitute Service Credit

Cited in the final operative part (visti gli art.) as the basis for upholding the State's position regarding salary calculation.

53.2006.32 · ti (art. 7 LStip)

Teacher's Salary Seniority Dispute and Salary Freeze Exemption

Cited in the final orders as the legal basis for the decision regarding salary differences.

53.2008.2 · ti (art. 7 LStip)

Teacher v. State: Recognition of Service Seniority for Salary Increments

Cited in the 'visti' section as a basis for the decision concerning initial salary and reductions.