173.300
LStip
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 40 LStip Legge sugli stipendi degli impiegati dello Stato e dei docenti (LStip)
LStip
Art. 40 LStip
1 L’autorità di nomina decide sulle pretese di natura pecuniaria derivanti dal rapporto di impiego dei dipendenti cantonali.
2 Contro le decisioni dell’autorità di nomina è dato ricorso ai sensi degli art. 65 e 66 LORD.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (26)
52.2023.150 · ti (art. 40 cpv. 1 LStip)
Employee Salary Recalculation Upon Departmental Transfer and Reclassification
Cited in conjunction with Art. 66 cpv. 1 LORD as the basis for the Tribunal's competence to rule on the matter.
52.2021.72 · ti (art. 40 cpv. 2 LStip)
Cantonal Police Salary Appeal Regarding Non-Analogous Experience and Family Obligations
Cited in combination with Art. 66 cpv. 1 LORD as establishing the Tribunal's competence to rule on the appeal.
52.2020.527 · ti (art. 40 cpv. 2 LStip)
Appeal Against Salary Classification for Part-Time Teaching Position Based on Prior Experience Weighting
This provision, in combination with Art. 66 para. 1 LORD, established the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court to rule on the appeal.
52.2018.357 · ti (art. 40 cpv. 1 LStip in combinato con l'art. 66 cpv. 1 della legge sull'ordinamento degli impiegati dello Stato e dei docenti del 15 marzo 1995 (LORD; RL 173.100))
Cook v. Classification Board (Equal Treatment in Salary Class)
Cited to establish the Tribunal's competence to rule on the matter.
52.2018.55 · ti (art. 40 cpv. 1 LStip)
State Employee v. State Council on Salary Classification Jurisdiction
Cited in order 3 to establish that the authority of appointment decides on pecuniary claims arising from the employment relationship, which supports the finding of incompetence of the State Council.
52.2017.649 · ti (art. 40 cpv. 1 LStip)
Employee Reclassification Appeal Regarding Salary Equity
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the Court's jurisdiction, in combination with Art. 66 cpv. 1 LORD.
52.2018.28 · ti (art. 40 cpv. 1 LStip)
Employee Salary Reclassification Appeal Due to Lack of Motivation and Document Access
Cited, along with Art. 66 LORD, to establish the Court's jurisdiction.
52.2018.500 · ti (art. 40 cpv. 1 LStip)
State Employee Salary Increments Appeal
Cited in the reasoning to justify why the request for retroactive salary adjustments preceding September 1, 2018, could not be processed by this court.
52.2019.115 · ti (art. 40 cpv. 1 LStip)
Employee Salary Class Reclassification Following Demotion and New Remuneration Model
Cited in conjunction with Art. 66 LORD to establish the Tribunal's jurisdiction over the appeal.
52.2018.40 · ti (art. 40 cpv. 1 LStip)
Employee Appeal of Civil Status Officer Classification
Cited in combination with Art. 66 cpv. 1 LORD to establish the Tribunal's jurisdiction over the appeal.
52.2018.18 · ti (art. 40 cpv. 1 LStip)
State Employee Salary Scheme Transition Appeal
Cited in combination with Art. 66 cpv. 1 LORD to establish the Tribunal's jurisdiction over the appeal.
52.2017.633 · ti (art. 40 cpv. 1 LStip)
Personnel Consultant Equivalence Certification vs. Federal Diploma Salary Classification Challenge
Cited in combination with Art. 66 cpv. 1 LORD as the basis for the court's jurisdiction to rule on the appeal.
52.2018.65 · ti (art. 40 cpv. 1 LStip)
Employee Salary Class Placement Dispute Under New Regulations
Cited to establish the jurisdiction of the Cantonal Administrative Tribunal to decide on the appeal.
52.2018.42 · ti (Art. 40 cpv. 1 LStip)
Employee Appeal Regarding Salary Transition Following Rank Assignment
Cited in combination with Art. 66 cpv. 1 LORD to establish the Court's jurisdiction over the appeal.
52.2017.646 · ti (Art. 40 cpv. 1 LStip)
Employee Salary Reclassification Appeal Under New Salary Structure
Cited, in combination with Art. 66 cpv. 1 LORD, to establish the Court's competence to rule on the appeal.