Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
173.110 RDST CH-TI

Art. 7 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)

RDSt
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (77 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 7 RDSt

1 Le funzioni di collaboratore scientifico di I, giurista di I, giurista redattore di I, economista di I, psicologo di I, specialista in scienze forensi di I e perito organizzatore di I possono essere attribuite unicamente a candidati in possesso di titoli di studio accademici completi: licenza universitaria, laurea, master universitario consecutivo oppure scuola universitaria professionale (Bachelor + Master 270/300 crediti ECTS).

2 La funzione di collaboratore tecnico, collaboratore scientifico di II, economista di II, psicologo di II e perito organizzatore di II può essere attribuita unicamente a candidati in possesso di almeno un bachelor oppure di una laurea breve. [6]

[6] Cpv. modificato dal R 27.3.2019; in vigore dal 29.3.2019 - BU 2019, 108.

← Art. 6 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt) Art. 8 RDSt →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (8)

12.2015.99 · ti (art. 7 LTF)
Fire Damage Apportionment and Costs on Appeal
Cited as part of the legal framework used for calculating appeal costs.
11.2009.131 · ti (art. 7 cpv. 1 LTF)
Appeal of Denial of Legal Aid in Spousal and Child Support Proceedings
Mentioned in relation to the State's inability to appeal the grant of legal aid in the reasoning.
30.2011.15 · ti (Art. 7 cpv. 2 LTF (implied by appeal instructions))
Employer Appeal on Fund's Prospective Premium Reimbursement Interpretation Dismissed
The instruction to appeal to the Federal Supreme Court mentions procedural requirements typical for appealing to that court, implying jurisdiction or the possibility of appeal under the relevant provisions (which typically relate to the final decision type).
36.2008.102 · ti (art. 7 LTF)
Claimant's Liability for Ex-Husband's Health Insurance Premiums Post-Separation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the prohibition for defaulting insured persons to change insurers.
36.2008.102 · ti (art. 7 capoversi 3 e 4 LTF)
Claimant's Liability for Ex-Husband's Health Insurance Premiums Post-Separation
Cited in the reasoning regarding exceptions to the prohibition for defaulting insured persons to change insurers.
11.2005.25 · ti (art. 7 cpv. 1 LTF)
Ex-Husband's Alimony Suppression Claim Denied Despite Changed Circumstances; Legal Fees Increased on Appeal
Mentioned in the section on legal remedies, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders, which only mention Art. 112, 74, 76, 116, 115 LTF in the final section summarizing remedies.
36.2005.74 · ti (Art. 7 cpv. 3 LTF)
Insured v. Health Insurer Regarding Late Premium Notification and Contract Cancellation
Though not explicitly cited in the dispositve, the mention of 'ricorso di diritto amministrativo al Tribunale federale delle assicurazioni' in point 3 indicates the framework for appeal, but since the text only has section 3 regarding recourse, Art. 30 cpv. 3 LTF covers the procedure for appeal to the next instance.
36.2012.67 · ti (Art. 7, cpv. 1 LTF)
Sickness Daily Allowance Denial Upheld Despite Claimant's Anxiety and Agoraphobia
This substantive provision defining 'loss of earning capacity' was cited in the grounds for the ruling (considerando 2.2), although it does not appear in the explicit dispositive orders 1, 2, or 3. Exclusion rule applies.