Art. 69 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)

30.2019.26 · ti (Art. 69 al. 2 LTF)

Disability Pension Increase Denial for Insufficient Proof of Worsening Condition

This provision is often cited for appeal scope or costs, but it is not explicitly in the operative part.

11.2017.61 · ti (Art. 69 LTF)

Spousal Support Modification Appeal Dismissed

Not cited in the dispositive orders (Art. 1, 2, 3).

14.2010.97 · ti (art. 69 cpv. 2 lett. a LTF)

Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Payment of Judicial Costs

This article is cited in the final section regarding the possibility of appealing to the Federal Tribunal, but not in the operative orders (1, 2, 3).

12.2009.92 · ti (art. 69 cpv. 2 LTF)

Appeal Struck for Non-Payment of Judicial Advance

The appeal fee was set in the second order of the dispositive.

60.2007.45 · ti (Art. 69 cpv. 2 cpv. 2 LTF [Implied/Contextual, but checking dispositive])

Oversight Body Access to Criminal Files for Disciplinary Review

The text shows no explicit citation for costs or legal aid in the dispositive orders (1 and 2). Order 2 states no fees/costs are levied, but does not cite a specific procedural article for this determination, only referring to the nature of the Commission.

12.2005.158 · ti (Art. 69 LTF)

Vehicle Repair Cost Dispute and Procedural Challenges Appeal

Applied to order the appellant to reimburse the respondent for legal fees (repetibili).

14.1998.88 · ti (Art. 69 cpv. 2 lett. a LTF)

Appellant's Appeal Struck for Failure to Deposit Costs; Bankruptcy Declared

The court declared bankruptcy as a consequence of the appeal being struck from the roll, given that partial suspensive effect had been granted.

16.1996.67 · ti (art. 69 LTF)

Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Advance Costs

This reference is usually the standard for imposing procedural costs in Ticino appeals, mentioned implicitly or explicitly in the cost order (Order 2). Assuming 'Spese del presente giudizio con tassa di giustizia' (Costs of these proceedings including judicial fee) refers to the relevant procedural cost regulation, which in this context often relates to the relevant cantonal procedural law, which is not specified here, but since no specific procedural article for costs is cited, only the imposed costs themselves are noted.

53.1995.8 · ti (Art. 69 al. 1 LTF)

Tax Assessor Indemnity for Unjustified Dismissal Calculation

Not applicable, this refers to the Federal Tribunal (LTF), not the Cantonal Court.

11.2017.47 · ti (Art. 68, art. 69 e art. 74 LTF)

Appellate Court Redetermines Child Support Jurisdiction and Amount Following Divorce Filing

Cited implicitly in order 2, which orders the appellant to reimburse reduced party costs (ripetibili ridotte) to the respondent.

30.2022.12 · ti (Art. 69 LTF)

Heirs' Liability for Improperly Deducted Family Allowance Repayment

This reference is implicitly invoked by the order to file Federal Supreme Court appeal within 30 days, standard for procedural disposition.

32.2002.25 · ti (Art. 69 LTF)

UAI Decision Annulment and Settlement Approval in Disability Insurance Appeal

The granting of Fr. 1000 for legal costs (ripetibili) implies the application of provisions governing these aspects, closely related to Art. 69 LTF regarding party compensation.

35.2021.92 · ti (art. 69 LTF)

Insured Worker v. Insurance Provider (Knee Injuries Stabilization Dispute)

Implicitly cited in the context of appeal rights to the Federal Tribunal (though not explicitly numbered in the dispositive, appeal rights are standard for final decisions unless explicitly waived).

38.2021.102 · ti (Art. 69 LTF)

Unemployment Insurance Claim Denied for Late Submission Past Peremptory Deadline

The order to place costs on the State implies consideration of the rules governing the allocation of judicial costs, such as Art. 69 LTF (or equivalent cantonal provisions/practice implied by the specific order in point 2 of the operative part).

72.2004.66 · ti (Art. 69 LTF)

Swiss Cocaine Trafficking and Narcotics Violations Convictions

Not cited in the dispositive.