173.110
RDST
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 67 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)
RDSt
Art. 67 RDSt
1 I dipendenti interessati sono tenuti a collaborare attivamente con lo Stato nell’esercizio del diritto di regresso segnatamente tramite l’immediata notifica all’Ufficio degli stipendi e delle assicurazioni dell’evento e dei fatti rilevanti quali il terzo responsabile e le circostanze dell’infortunio, il corretto adempimento degli obblighi di informazione nei confronti delle assicurazioni, il rifiuto di sottoscrivere transazioni di risarcimento senza il preventivo consenso scritto dell’Ufficio degli stipendi e delle assicurazioni e, se richiesto, la cessione dei propri diritti allo Stato fino a concorrenza dello stipendio ricevuto.
2 L’omissione colpevole di tali obblighi da parte del dipendente interessato può comportare l’obbligo di risarcimento nei confronti dello Stato.
3 La surrogazione è limitata alle prestazioni e pretese connesse all’incapacità lavorativa o di guadagno nella funzione o in una funzione sostitutiva del dipendente.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (23)
11.2011.76 · ti (Art. 67 LTF)
Appeal on Retroactive Application of Maintenance Law Following Divorce
Mentioned in the final section regarding appeal remedies, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (I-VII).
35.2012.88 · ti (Art. 67 LTF)
Insured Worker v. Insurer Regarding Timeliness of Procedural Review of Terminated Accident Benefits
This provision is not cited in the dispositive.
35.2012.88 · ti (art. 67 cpv. 1 LTF)
Insured Worker v. Insurer Regarding Timeliness of Procedural Review of Terminated Accident Benefits
Not explicitly cited in the operative orders, although procedural matters regarding appeal to the Federal Tribunal are mentioned in order 3.
14.2009.78 · ti (art. 67 LTF)
Creditor Execution Proceedings and Recalculation of Procedural Costs
Cited in the preliminary reasoning section leading to the decision, indicating the applicable procedural framework for the judgment.
52.1998.29 · ti (art. 67 cpv. 1 LTF)
Game Warden Contract Renewal Appeal Dismissed Due to Procedural and Factual Findings
While the full text is not present, provisions related to costs (following the rejection of the petition) are cited in the dispositive.
11.2011.76 · ti (art. 67 LTF)
Appeal Regarding Retroactive Spousal and Child Support Allocation Based on Separation Law
Cited in comparison to the principles governing the apportionment of first-instance costs when ruling on appeal.
11.2017.10 · ti (Art. 67 Costi LTF)
Artisan Collective Hypothec Registration Dispute and Moot Appeal Costs Assessment
Cited in the reasoning concerning the application of federal appeal deadlines.
14.2004.62 · ti (Art. 67 LTF)
Creditor v. Principal-Debtor and Spouse: Provisional Rejection of Opposition to Debt Collection Order Based on Brokerage Agreement
Not explicitly cited in the dispositive.
14.2009.78 · ti (art. 67 LTF)
Reallocation of Procedural Costs After Successful Federal Tribunal Appeal in Enforcement Opposition Setting-Aside Action
This article is cited as part of the legal basis for the decision, likely related to the nature of the proceeding following the Federal Tribunal's referral.
17.2009.64 · ti (Art. 67 LTF)
Appeal Against Conviction for Robbery, Drug and Weapon Offenses: Modification of Conditional Sentence and Annulment of Confiscation
Implied by the ordering provisions concerning the allocation of procedural costs (taxa di giustizia and spese processuali).
31.2002.22 · ti (Art. 67 LTF)
Social Security Fund v. Managing Partners of Sagl for Unpaid Contributions
Costs provisions often implicitly rely on this article, but here specific cost provisions (Art. 4 and Art. 5) are used in the dispositive.
32.2006.211 · ti (Art. 67 LTF)
Claimant v. Invalidity Insurance Office: Lumbar Disc Herniation Pension Revocation Appeal
This article governs costs when the appeal is decided on its merits; however, the decision explicitly cites Art. 69 cpv. 1bis LAI for fees and Art. 61 lett. g LPGA for compensation.
32.2006.34 · ti (Art. 67 cpv. 1 LTF)
Insured vs. Disability Insurance Office: Disability Benefits for Lumbar Syndrome and Arthritis
Not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1, 2, and 3. The costs provision mentioned is Art. 66 al. 1 LTF (in the context of the previous Swiss Federal Tribunal ruling structure, this local court decision refers to costs via state assumption or local rules, but based strictly on the provided dispositive I-III, no LTF article governing costs/legal aid is explicitly cited there).
33.2001.118 · ti (Art. 67 LTF)
Insured Person v. Cantonal Compensation Fund (Supplementary Benefits Calculation)
This provision is cited in the dispositive (point 2) to state that the costs (expenses) are charged to the State (le spese sono poste a carico dello Stato).
33.2012.14 · ti (Art. 67 LTF)
Cantonal Insurance Court Affirms Denial of Supplementary Benefits for Couple with Institutionalized Spouse
This article is the basis for the decision to allocate judicial costs to the State (instead of the appealing party).